In my opinion, which doesn't hold much water, anyone attempting to argue with Lazer, could find a better and more productive use of that time.
I fell out of my chair laughing at this. I like how you think.EddieHarren said:In my opinion, which doesn't hold much water, anyone attempting to argue with Lazer, could find a better and more productive use of that time.
I subtract one hole diameter as represented by a bullet shot to the side of groups. With my cheap targets, bullet holes rarely if ever match cal.Syncrowave said:Isn't that the way everybody does it?Joe Salt said:I always measured the widest part of the group then subtract the diameter of the bullet.
EddieHarren said:In my opinion, which doesn't hold much water, anyone attempting to argue with Lazer, could find a better and more productive use of that time.
This is how I do it as well, measure a bullet hole on target. The black marks are usually smaller than the nominal caliber. This gives a more accurate center-to-center figure, but that also means a slightly bigger number. So if comparing to someone who is subtracting simply the caliber, you will come up with slightly bigger numbers for the exact same bullet placement. In other words, for a 'competition', they all should be measured the same way to level the playing field.mikecr said:I subtract one hole diameter as represented by a bullet shot to the side of groups. With my cheap targets, bullet holes rarely if ever match cal.
Lazer said:Ther was no reason to ever start an argument I am being completely honest and fair in the original challenge, and my entry.
mikecr said:I subtract one hole diameter as represented by a bullet shot to the side of groups. With my cheap targets, bullet holes rarely if ever match cal.
What he said lets get down to itDos XX said:Lay a ruler across that group. Prove all the doubters wrong. Nothing to it.
This post has been here for an hour and nobody has anything to say looks like about .363 to meLazer said:![]()
Special delivery for butch lambert!
Looks the same to me, makes it a .462 I think. Which is good shooting, but not .359drumcorpschamp said:Yep......not right to my eye. Looks like the scale shows the bullet holes at about 1/8" diameter.
Jerry
Better things to do181backup said:Where did everyone go