• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Maximum height of bullet trajectory?

I also agree that the reason why this is a common misconception is, as you identified, the 'drop in inches at the target' that most calculators display. For example, JBM shows the bullet drop at the target as -275 inches at 1000 yards for the data you provided. I believe what a lot of people do not realize is that this is not the 'drop from the apex of the bullet trajectory' but rather 'the difference in height at which the bullet would be, from the center of the target, at the target, if gravity did not exist'.

There is a super straight forward explanation for drop. At 1,000 yards, if you do not touch the scope with a 100 yard zero and hold dead center, the bullet will attempt to drop precisely the 32 moa specified for a TR rifle.

Of course, we don’t mount targets high enough off the ground to ever see this drop play out, and they hit dirt well before the target.

When we add 32 moa to a TR rifle’s 100 yard zero, we have moved the crosshairs aim point close to 30 feet. This doesn’t mean the bullet will rise 30 feet, (because it rises and falls versus just “falling” if you don’t dial) and that is simply the amount that a given cartridge/bullet needs to reach 1,000 yards and it’s still less than one degree of difference.

When Staubach era QB’s threw deep with their natural arms, 40 degrees of departure angle, (over the top row seats could be needed) to reach the end zone. The top row-opposite end zone is never in danger of catching a ball aimed at them.

Interestingly, FG kickers must bring the angle down, and simply wail the snot out of football to have any chance at all of 60 plus yards, which means they clearly would be F-Open, not TR shooters.
 
Last edited:
Gravity isn’t as strong as bullet trajectory suggests.

I the absence of gravity, the bullet should stop several miles away because of air resistance alone, and float in the air stationary, in line with the bore, waiting for us to go retrieve it and figure out how to swage and reload it.

In the absence of air (vacuum) but with normal gravity, bullets will never (necessarily) slow down. If one knew MV and bore orientation, the exact place of impact could be predicted. Bullet shape, weight, size, and stability would not matter. Forward, backward, sideways. MV would reign.

Gravity “could be” zero impediment to hitting a target in a vacuum, meaning distance can be infinitely compensated by holdover and become almost irrelevant. A target straight up from gravity or almost such, would be an exception but is also an exception to how we shoot. Gravity’s deceleration of a bullet in a typical arc is negligible.

Looked at this way, air, not gravity, is our challenge. To air, BC is our shield and MV is the sword.
 
Last edited:

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,525
Messages
2,197,980
Members
78,961
Latest member
Nicklm
Back
Top