Pareto
Silver $$ Contributor
But the issue isn't that the scope is old. It is that the manufacturer instructed me to contact X and Y. They blew me off until today partly due to being contacted by Mari instead of previously responding affirmatively to my emails making clear that I was getting in touch as per March.Let me inject a measure of reality here. The March 50-42 was introduced in 2008 as one of the very first riflescopes from DEON Optical. It, of course, came with an ED lens as DEON was the pioneer in using such glass in riflescopes. It was discontinued in 2017 and then current 48X52 was introduced, sporting Super ED lenses. I am sure that DEON will work with Pareto to get the riflescope repaired, and all he has to do is get the riflescope to them.
I have sent one riflescope back to Japan, to get a different reticle installed because my eyes had gotten progressively worse over the 7 years I had the riflescope. It was returned directly to my door within a month of departure, with a note saying they had swapped the reticle and even adjusted a focus area, about which I had never complained. I still have that riflescope and the note.
I have heard from a few people who have sent back a March riflescope for service and it's a similar story.
Presumably there is a protocol here that the manufacturer is assuming that the distributors didn't seem eager to comply with.