Indeed. Me too.What item are you lubing? I can guess but that gets me in trouble sometimes.
Haha. Case neck is lubed before seating the bullet. I have used NeolubeWhat item are you lubing? I can guess but that gets me in trouble sometimes.
Just looking at the data and not seeing much difference on target and trying to choose which way to go, I'd go with the one showing the better chrono numbers, especially for long distance shooting. Then again. . . I'd still shoot another session to verify.
Except for a couple, looks like some pretty consistent trimming there.Just to add more fuel to fire- AMP Press plot:
Cartridge is 7FCP, shooting 184gr BergerWhat were your conditions while shooting. It appears that the overall size of the group shot with lube is smaller than the size of the group shot without lube. You may want to retest with no wind or very light winds. The ES of the lubed shots is 1/2 of the non-lubed shots. As asked earlier virgin brass or had it been fired several times, building up carbon in the brasses neck for lubrication?
I totally agree with you 100% on everything you said. For me, the biggest surprise was the AMP graph.I'm not sure how any conclusions could really be made either way. Two separate groups at .419moa and .357moa at 900 yards. How can this not be attributed to normal dispersion?
SD's may be half in the second string but doesn't show a positive difference in vertical dispersion as it is also a taller group.
SD's of all shots combined are less than 4.
Amp graph shows what you might think should be a difference, target doesn't seem to agree.
If I was made to make a choice between the 2 and go shoot a match tomorrow, I'd go with the no lube as it would take less time to load ammo. The only real conclusion that can be made, imo, is that is some good shooting and you'll do well with whatever you pick.