• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Lube vs no lube test

That's pretty much what I've experienced.

If you're up to taking this a step further, try lubing the inside of the case neck and the bearing surface of the bullet with Neolube 2.
 
Lubing or not lubing this is my question.
Target is 900 yards

View attachment 1667739
Just looking at the data and not seeing much difference on target and trying to choose which way to go, I'd go with the one showing the better chrono numbers, especially for long distance shooting. Then again. . . I'd still shoot another session to verify. ;)

Just to add more fuel to fire- AMP Press plot:
Except for a couple, looks like some pretty consistent trimming there. :D
 
Its pretty obvious to me. When I look at long range groups I am looking at a lot of things. One of them is if its trying to wad up. In your no lube break it down into 3 shot groups. 1 2 and 3 form a nice group so do 4 5 and 6. You can also look at the wad in the middle with one out the left and one out the right. The lubed neck doesnt have as good of consecutive 3 shots or a wad. To me its obvious that the no lube is trying to shoot tighter. I often look at consecutive 3 shots in f class targets. I can tell if the guns trying to shoot, and it takes some of the conditions out that way.
 
What were your conditions while shooting. It appears that the overall size of the group shot with lube is smaller than the size of the group shot without lube. You may want to retest with no wind or very light winds. The ES of the lubed shots is 1/2 of the non-lubed shots. As asked earlier virgin brass or had it been fired several times, building up carbon in the brasses neck for lubrication?
 
I'm not sure how any conclusions could really be made either way. Two separate groups at .419moa and .357moa at 900 yards. How can this not be attributed to normal dispersion?

SD's may be half in the second string but doesn't show a positive difference in vertical dispersion as it is also a taller group.

SD's of all shots combined are less than 4.

Amp graph shows what you might think should be a difference, target doesn't seem to agree.

If I was made to make a choice between the 2 and go shoot a match tomorrow, I'd go with the no lube as it would take less time to load ammo. The only real conclusion that can be made, imo, is that is some good shooting and you'll do well with whatever you pick.
 
What were your conditions while shooting. It appears that the overall size of the group shot with lube is smaller than the size of the group shot without lube. You may want to retest with no wind or very light winds. The ES of the lubed shots is 1/2 of the non-lubed shots. As asked earlier virgin brass or had it been fired several times, building up carbon in the brasses neck for lubrication?
Cartridge is 7FCP, shooting 184gr Berger
Lapua brass has 6th firings on them, and this is my test brass.
 
I'm not sure how any conclusions could really be made either way. Two separate groups at .419moa and .357moa at 900 yards. How can this not be attributed to normal dispersion?

SD's may be half in the second string but doesn't show a positive difference in vertical dispersion as it is also a taller group.

SD's of all shots combined are less than 4.

Amp graph shows what you might think should be a difference, target doesn't seem to agree.

If I was made to make a choice between the 2 and go shoot a match tomorrow, I'd go with the no lube as it would take less time to load ammo. The only real conclusion that can be made, imo, is that is some good shooting and you'll do well with whatever you pick.
I totally agree with you 100% on everything you said. For me, the biggest surprise was the AMP graph.
I expected to see a difference on the target, but it's not showing up.

Using Neolube reduces friction between the bullet and the case, and I get that the graph would reflect that. But I thought there would be some elevation issues with bullets seated without the lube.
 
It just go to show you, as one person on this thread always says, "test and verify"
What you think or don't think should work doesn't always work out, in the end
what does matter is what the target tells you.
Nice test.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,131
Messages
2,190,433
Members
78,722
Latest member
BJT20
Back
Top