Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you looking for higher velocity or faster burn rate. A faster burn rate might not get you higher velocity, but a slower burn rate might. i notice in Hodgdon's load data that for some cartridges, Hybrid 100V gives higher velocities with a lot less pressure than H4350 and H4831sc.
If you can get your hands on some of the "old" IMR 4007 powder (I know there was a recall) I believe that would fill your bill to a tee!
I was always under the impression that load density had to do with volume in the case, where can I read up on weight calculating density?Load density is calculated by weight and not volume. If a case holds 50 grains of water then a 50 grain charge of powder is 100% load density. Smokeless powders typically are denser than water so it is easy to get load densities over 100% and still not fill the case volume.
Nevermind, google strikes again! Looks like it is a combination of weight and volume, so I wasn't totally wrong.I was always under the impression that load density had to do with volume in the case, where can I read up on weight calculating density?
I'm looking for a powder that will provide the consistency of H4350, the same kind of ES numbers, that is slightly faster, with out increasing volume. So in round numbers what I'm looking for is a powder to give a similar pressure and velocity of say 50 grains of H4350 but with slightly less volume of powder as H4350. (think of something that is like a really fast lot of H4350)
I had a good load worked up that was right at 100% fill last yr.... Got a new lot of H4350 and oops, now I need nearly a grain more to keep the same MV, but the case is out of volume.
I'm dabbling with N150 right now but it seems to be a bit less dense. It can get to the velocity with less weight, but it seems to take about the same volume, which translates to just a bit too much to get to where I want to be.
Re16 seems to be in the right pressure range but it takes more volume, so it won't work.
Any other ideas?
I have switched to RL-17 for my 284 WIN F Class gun. I am in the process of trying RL-16 in hopes it is more temp stable.
To that end, here is some QuickLoad data on RL-16, RL-17 and H4350.
All three loads are within 6 fps of Mv around 2918 fps with 162 gr bullets in a 28.75" barrel.
Powder Weight fill
RL-16 51.7gr 96.3%
RL-17 51.7gr 89.4%
H4350 53.3gr 98.3%
THESE ARE NOT LOAD RECOMMENDATIONS, JUST RELATIVE DATA!
Powder Weight fill
RL-16 51.7gr 96.3%
H4350 53.3gr 98.3%
THESE ARE NOT LOAD RECOMMENDATIONS, JUST RELATIVE DATA!
QL says in my 284 WIN N150 needs 52 gr for comparable velocity as my previous post. The fill is 100% and the pressure is sky high!
If this is by volume then this seems to contradict some other posts here from folks trying R16 in 6.5x47 cases. When asked in another thread those posters noted that RL16 required less weight but a greater % fill by volume to get the same velocities.
http://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/alliant-reloder-16.3905416/page-6#post-36839396
This is the whole point of this thread. My current testing says N150 isn't the answer for which we are searching.I was on that thread. ...
I need something around H4350 that gives the right burn rate with less fill volume. I believe N150 is what I will try next.