It looks like the original load (top, left) had one pulled shot out right, otherwise it would still have been about 1/2 MOA. Perhaps the load is still ok and it is the trigger puller that needs some work.
How many rounds have you put through the rifle in the last year? That number should give you some indication of whether it is time to re-visit load development. If it is only a couple hundred rounds, my first observation probably holds true. If the number is closer to 1000, measure the distance to "touching" the lands and see how it compares to the last measurement in terms of COAL or CBTO. If you decide to continue tweaking the load, I would also suggest using a finer increment in seating depth testing like .003". It is sometimes possible to miss a fairly narrow seating depth optimum when using a seating depth test increment as large as .005".
How does the current muzzle velocity compare to what it was when you first worked up the load? Likewise, a noticeable change in velocity due to temperature differences or other sources can also be an indicator that you need to re-visit charge weight as well as seating depth. If so, I'd probably start with that first, and leave the seating depth where it was until you find a [new] optimal charge weight. Then you can re-visit seating depth using the most recent optimal charge weight, and slightly finer increments.
Keeping meticulous records during load development is critical. If you have good records, the rifle will usually tell you whether it is time to re-develop a load. Accuracy/precision is only one indicator that it is time to re-work a load that has been in use for a while. Other indicators such as round count, the distance from bullet to lands (i.e. land erosion), and muzzle velocity can also provide useful clues when something has changed sufficiently to warrant closer inspection and possible load re-development.
Finally, how good are you about cleaning the rifle? Build-up of carbon at the end of the case neck (i.e. "carbon ring", or in the throat and first couple inches of barrel can also do bad things to accuracy/precision. If you don't own a borescope, a good cleaning regimen after every use of the rifle is strongly recommended, so as never to let significant carbon/copper fouling build up in the first place. I'd be cautious about suggesting to everyone that they should run out and buy a borescope. The Teslong borescopes have certainly brought decent quality borescopes into such a low price range that almost anyone can own one if they wish. However, the downside to that is that there is also tendency for new borescope owners to reach a state of high anxiety over every little speck they find in the rifle bore or chamber. I refer to this as "Borescope Anxiety Disorder" (i.e. BAD), and it can sometimes be almost as much a problem as not looking at the bore at all. Nonetheless, it is not a bad idea to have one, even if it is used most often simply to ensure the chosen cleaning regimen is working satisfactorily.