I am 300BO fan. I have a couple of 300BO bolt rifles (1:7.5 twist) that shoot supersonic ammo very well. A few years back (2018) I decided to shift to a dedicated supersonic setup, which was solved with a 300HAM’R (1:15). Honestly, at that point in time it didn’t even occurred to me to have a custom barrel (slow twist) spun up for supers in 300BO. The HAM’R was a plug and play answer with increased velocity (300BO +P). A few more years of experience with 300BO and a fair amount of interaction with Dellet has helped me close the performance gap between 300BO and 300HAM’R.
As Dellet pointed out there is a combination(s) of bullet and twist rate that work/perform well for a subsonic load. Admittedly, I have a tendency to equate larger caliber subsonic with heavy bullets. When pursuing lighter projectiles I tend to step down into a smaller cartridge or smaller caliber.
My name is Oso… and I have a cartridge addiction. I will try to do better.
We’ve talked about this before, I’m at the opposite end and try a lot of things with the same cartridge. Always fun conversation
It really just depends on your sense of humor. Some how I picture an 86 grain bullet at 1000 fps from a 1/17 twist as flying like a knuckle ball. The bullet is .308x.500”
Light subs are just plain fun to shoot. An 86 grain bullet at 1050 fps in a 6 pound rifle has about 3X the recoil impulse of a 22LR in the same 6 pound rifle. That puts it slightly less than a 22 Magnum in the same 6 ponder. The big difference is retained energy. The 86 grain bullet has as much energy at 300 yards as the 40 grain 22LR at 25 yards. You can actually hear the steel ring
So on the light bullet side, 86 grain @ 1000 fps and 7,62X25 Tokarev performance, up to 3000 fps in an 18” barrel.
Mid weight Supers, if barrel length is the same, you pretty well end up with 30-30 performance with 110-175 grain bullets. Certainly better than 30 Carbine. In a hand fed action all of these are on the table as subs. Basically the velocity range on the top end is 2500 fps for the 110 and 2000 for the 175 in a 16” barrel.
Heavy bullets velocity drops off pretty quickly, but a 265 grain cast at 1400 fps is a respectful load.
The AR 15 is a big limiting factor for the cartridge. The magazine length limits some supers and pressures needed to cycle the action make subs under 150 grains not very interesting.
So with people shooting the “same cartridge” with a 200 grain difference in bullet weight and a 2000 fps difference in velocity, not to mention almost a 20” difference in barrel length where the same load can be 500 fps difference, or tailored to be the same if a subsonic load. I just don’t understand the mentality that a single powder or twist rate would work without disappointing results somewhere along the line. But it does explain why so many people have pretty mediocre results and others consistently have sub MOA result across a broad range of loads.