fyrewall said:In most longer range shooting bullets with better form factors and higher BC's are preferred; shooting rodents with a .20 is a similar application. In my thinking, slight velocity differences between the 32 & 40 Vmax are inadequate to justify deployment of the stubby 32 Vmax's against the rodents.
Well, first it is important to keep in mind we are comparing two bullets both of which have crappy BC's -- .275 vs .221. You're getting hung up on your cow because it is prettier than my pig.

Second, I'd say the vast majority of PD's are shot within 300 yards, and I wouldn't call the difference in travel times for the 32s vs the 40s at 300 and under "slight." The difference is very noticeable in actual shooting.
Finally, I'm guessing you haven't actually tried the 32s on "rodents." Everyone I have seen try them for a day has been immediately converted from a skeptic to a advocate, and now will not shoot anything but them in .20 cal. The terminal ballistics are incredible, and they get to actually see the explosion in their scope.
Guys say, oh, but I have a brake so I get to see the hits. I say, well, great, but don't bring an unsuppressed rifle anywhere near me when I'm shooting PDs. You'll scare the dogs down and force me to use serious ear pro.
