• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Is shot placement more important than bullets?

Thats exactly the point I made. Shot placement with enough bullet and energy. I went over those points tediously.
The problem with these forum discussions is that there little to no discussion about the lack of safety of over kill, (read over penetration). Kill the game but no collateral damage.

Too may shooters just add power and bullett. Hell I stopped using my 6.5x55, it just penetrates too much and flies forever if there's a miss for my area.

The ballistic math is clear, unless there's a 70% or more chance that your only shots will be 300 yards or more no magnums are required. However I see 7MM Remington mags in the field for deer in Pennsylvania. 95% of the shots are way under 200 yards with most 100 or less. I know 2 guys using 30-378's. They get huge holes in an animal not realizing that they got no expansion, it's a large secondary wound channel and the bullet kept going, into the unknown!

Hunting a farmers field on a small farm may mean for safety a 30 30, 444 Marlin and limit the range of the shot. Actually stalk and hunt, close the range.

Clearly there are places where it's safe to use 6.5MM and larger magnum calibers but clearly there's even more where it's not safe. We don't talk about safety enough.
 
A devil’s advocate statement only:
P.O. Ackley’s extensive observations in hydrostatic shock with game animals being shot with small high speed bullets is certainly an interesting study. One chapter is written by a guy shooting a 17 Ackley Bee and even when intentionally hitting animals in non-vital regions they all drop fast. Would I hunt large game with a small caliber/cartridge? Nah. But I do believe hydrostatic shock plays an important contributing role in lethality.
 
Last edited:
A devil’s advocate statement only:
P.O. Ackley’s extensive observations in hydrostatic shock with game animals being shot with small high speed bullets is certainly an interesting study. One chapter is written by a guy shooting a 17 Ackley Bee and even when intentionally hitting animals in non-vital regions they all drop fast. Would I hunt large game with a small caliber/cartridge? Nah. But I do believe hydrostatic shock plays an important contributing role in lethality.
100% in agreement as of today close to 100 northeastern groundhogs, and about 40 coyotes have succumbed to the 17 hornet, so far no crawl offs, and no unrecoverable yotes,90% drt in tracks, a few spinners who made 50 to 75 yards before going down.Would this qualify as hydrostatic shock?
 

Attachments

  • hs0.jpg
    hs0.jpg
    994 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
100% in agreement as of today close to 100 northeastern groundhogs, and about 40 coyotes have succumbed to the 17 hornet, so far no crawl offs, and no unrecoverable yotes,90% drt in tracks, a few spinners who made 50 to 75 yards before going down.Would this qualify as hydrostatic shock?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,786
Messages
2,203,170
Members
79,110
Latest member
miles813
Back
Top