Turbulent Turtle
F-TR competitor
Joe C said:(snip)
One of the reasons I bring this up, besides my own ravenous desire to learn and become a better marksman, is something that has been rolling around in my head for some time. I have several friends that are crossing over from sling to FTR and watching these guys who have shot sling and irons for 30+ years come on to the F-Class scene (mostly due to eye sight and physical limitations) has been very interesting because they can truly read the wind like very few F-class shooters I've ever seen.
Well the above was the genesis of F-class; named after George Farquharson, a long time Canadian fullbore shooter getting on in age petitioned the DCRA to allow the use of bipod and scope to make up for failing eyesight and weakening muscles. He wanted to continue playing with his friends. The rest, as they say, is history (yet still being written.)
We have many excellent sling shooters at the club and I talk with them quite a bit about the differences between Match rifles and F-TR. My background is fullbore and Palma from decades back and I got into F-class before it was sanctioned by the NRA. F-class has evolved a great deal since Farkie started it and it has reached the point where some sling shooters are actually reluctant to try it. I discuss the level of handloading precision needed in F-TR along with the rifles and it's a little scary. Also, you drive a match rifle by adjusting the sights for each shot because you can only favor a little bit as you break the shot. It took me quite a while to realize you do not want to constantly mess with the scope in F-class. There were many cases in Raton where I was holding at the edge of the black or even at the edge of the paper to shoot 10s and Xs. You don't do that with match rifles.
The folks who successfully make the transition from Irons to F-class are also able to make the adjustments in the shooting. It's not that difficult, but it's another mindset.