How does that encourage more shooting?The only thing that gets me is I have had guys tell me they were running all over the country to get enough SOY point and it cost them in the neighbor hood of $10.000 to do it and still didn't win.
This sport is expensive enough without running all over to do it. So I say shoot a 10 match agg. and be done with it. If you want to shoot other matches they just don't count toward SOY points , just your first ten.
Joe Salt
It would be nice to get something going in Pascagoula. I believe, last I heard, they have only 600 yards?I hope I'm not over stepping my boundaries but I do believe and have heard that little old Pascagoula MS. Is about to start certified IBS matches. Maybe others can chime in. @Falfan2017 @group therapy
Darrin
Good example of above the Ballot sent out was exactly like a shooter wrote it . Because it can’t be changed from the way it was sent in with signatures and presented at the winter meeting . I guess someone only got half the story on that.This forum has said it VERY WELL !! Same old members on E-Board and Long Range Committee with there CRONYISM. They use the rules that meet there agenda for what they want and leave out rules when they oppose there agenda. They speak of how they grow the sport one day. Then next time the speak of how attendance is off at ranges and our prize tables are harder to fill and clubs want join the IBS because of turmoil. They make statements like " the shooters run this show if they would just do it like the rule book says". Who really runs the SHOW? Who sent out the BALLOT that was so poorly wrote? "NOT THE SHOOTERS"
This forum has said it VERY WELL !! Same old members on E-Board and Long Range Committee with there CRONYISM. They use the rules that meet there agenda for what they want and leave out rules when they oppose there agenda.....
No dog in this hunt but this thread is enough to turn off anyone contemplating shooting 1K BR.
Can you tell me when this has not happen ?How very true you have stated it !.!.!
From the IBS By-Laws there is suppose to be a new LR Committee elected every year (minus the IBS Presidents appointee's).
Here are those By-Law's (which are repeatedly violated):
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARTICLE XV 1000-YARD COMMITTEE
Section 1.
The 1000 Yard Committee shall consist of a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of six (6) Individual Members nominated and elected by a majority vote of the 1000 Yard competitors at the Annual Meeting.
Section 2.
The members of the 1000 Yard Committee from among their number shall designate the Chairperson of the 1000 Yard Committee.
Section 3.
The members of the 1000 Yard Committee shall serve a term of one (1) year or until the next Annual Meeting, whichever is greater.
Section 4.
The 1000 Yard Committee shall be responsible for making recommendations regarding 1000 Yard competition to the Board of Directors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Myself I've been saying these 2 things for years:
- The LR Committee should be made up of 1 representative for each range, and no more then just them.
- Online voting instead of having to travel to and attend the annual meeting.
Been along time for sure.... which is why I state that it has been "repeatedly violated".Can you tell me when this has not happen ?
Been hearing that same basic reply since 2011 (when it was decided to be implemented).Online voting is being worked on very hard but it’s not a easy task from what I have been told.
The LRC has been voted on by the membership in attendance at every winter meeting as a matter of a fact last year it was done by ballot . Every member on the LRC is a 1 year term no where does it say they have term limits . So I ask again when has this not been done exactly how the bylaws say it should be ?-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Been along time for sure.... which is why I state that it has been "repeatedly violated".
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Been hearing that same reply since 2011 (when it was decided to be implemented).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in extent to what I've read in annual meeting minutes.The LRC has been voted on by the membership in attendance at every winter meeting as a matter of a fact last year it was done by ballot . Every member on the LRC is a 1 year term no where does it say they have term limits . So I ask again when has this not been done exactly how the bylaws say it should be ?
Have you offered to help with online voting if you would like to I’m sure President Stover would be glad to talk to you about it.
Not only 1 k but IBS periodNo dog in this hunt but this thread is enough to turn off anyone contemplating shooting 1K BR.
No one complained about Florida club shooting at the Georgia range so it is nothing new, you act like Virginia is the only club that has used or piggyback with another club.To all IBS Long Range Shooters: There is a lot more to this story than previously posted. VA 1K has been using the Harry Jones Range for 7-9 years. I don't know who approved this piggyback arrangement within the IBS but it happened. Since then, a small handful (18-22) 1K shooters have used this arrangement to their personal SOY benefit by shooting 12 or more matches annually at the Harry Jones/VA 1K range(many times 20 matches were shot by an individual). Many of them are officers of the VA 1K Range and the Harry Jones Range. If there is any doubt about my statement go the results pages on the IBS website and research who and how many! I did!
I am sympathetic about the loss of a Range. I watched two of them that I frequented in Missouri go away. I did a little research and over the last 15 years we have lost at least 7 more including the Iowa Range that hosted 2 of our 1K National Championships. So the loss of a Range is unfortunate, but certainly not unheard of. I don't want VA 1K to go away. I want them to find their own range and stop creating doubt about a fair 1K SOY system within the IBS. We all have challenges in our lives and deal with them, it's time for them to do the same. Mike G stated "Only a very few guys give a shit about SOY". If that's the case I challenge Mike and the rest of the VA1K officers to abandon their Club's SOY points awarding ability and end this whole thing. Watch the Crawfishing on this!!!!
I would like to see any evidence that having two clubs at a individual range promotes the IBS or Shooting in general. The Range is still there, open to IBS shooters. How does adding a club produce a new shooter? Any VA 1K member can shoot the Harry Jones range. What does VA 1K offer the shooter that Harry Jones range doesn't already. Hmm? Maybe it's additional SOY points.
I got involved in this issue at the request of fellow IBS member. He asked for assistance in writing an Agenda Item that would get VA1K out of his state. He said that their presence hurt attendance at the range of his choice, White Horse. I agreed to help him with his issues and possibly eliminate the inequities that the Piggy back situation between VA1K and Harry Jones create within the IBS.
With all of this being said, we as IBS members, have the opportunity to vote on this issue. But I caution you to understand what your vote will determine. If you vote "Yes" any 1K range that has the ability to host another "Club" may present Club officers that fabricate a story, present it to the IBS for approval. The IBS does not have the ability or resources to police any attempt to create a "Sham Club". Secondly, the majority of IBS clubs cannot host another Club do to schedule restraints imposed on them by the Range Owners thus perpetuating the SOY inequities we see today. A vote for "NO" prevents any Range from allowing a piggyback club the ability of awarding SOY points. The exception is the VA 1K range which this Agenda Item grandfathers. Please note: with a lopsided "NO" vote the LR committee will take note of the vote's outcome and have somewhat of an obligation to respond accordingly.