• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

I need less eye relief

I was taught to divide the objective into the power
Addendum- no hair splitting just overview :cool:
Think about that for a bit. For the same effective objective diameter, the higher the power, the smaller the exit pupil. Just check out some manufacturers' spec's. Lets do a couple of examples. With the same 40mm objective, the exit pupil for a 6X would be 40/6 = 6.7mm. On the other hand if we do the same calculation at 24x we get 40/24= 1.7mm.
 
Last edited:
Check with the scope manufacturer they give the eye relief
Most changes with power
Then your have two choices
Get the scope mount that let you get
It
Or. Adjust the stock
Most inexpensive have short eye relief
 
I'm kinda busy today Bart"
Maybe call Sightron and take it up with them.
J
Another way to calculate exit pupil is to divide the eyepiece focal length in millimeters by the telescope's focal ratio (f/stop) like camera lenses have. If the 10X scope eyepiece has a 50mm focal length, its objective lens combined system (all lenses in front of the second focal plane) has a 500mm focal length. If its main objective lens diameter is 50mm, the f/stop equals 500 mm focal length divided by 50 mm lens diameter or f/10. 50/10 = 5mm exit pupil. Same as a 50mm lens divided by 10 power
 
I'd just put a longer tube scope on it that better matches the long action.
If u cannot make it fit you correctly u sure are going to have a hard time shooting it accurate. Some short tube scopes just do not fit right on long action guns and buying special rings at extra cost is not something I look for in a setup like that.
 
Last edited:
He makes no sense, it is back as far as it will go .... you need more eye relief. you need extension rings facing the rear to get the scope back further. if I'm not mistaken I thought the old ones had a second place to the rear to mount the scope rings, unless it isn't that old. I have used 6 x 42's my whole life since they came out great scope.... jim
 
What was the disposition of this issue? Would like to know as it would help others confronted with the problem.

The only problem is the stock is too long and from the crappy pic. it doesn't look like a 6x42 Leupold and I would bet the length of pull is well over the 13.5" norm.... jim
 
The only problem is the stock is too long and from the crappy pic. it doesn't look like a 6x42 Leupold and I would bet the length of pull is well over the 13.5" norm.... jim

I'd put a different scope on it, one that works, and call it history.
 
Wow. none this has any thing to do with the problem. eye relief on the scope is what is, measure from the trigger to the back of the butt plate. There is the problem if it is over 13.5", all 6 power leupold scopes are over 3.5 " eye relief. I had a ruger 77 in 308 and I had a 3 power Leupold on it and I still cut the stock off to a 13" pull to see a full scope. The cheapest fix is a saw...... jim
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,266
Messages
2,215,362
Members
79,508
Latest member
Jsm4425
Back
Top