@HappyHellfire I get your frustration. I also completely get other forum members frustrations.
I think we all see a disconnect in communication. "Testing" for example. "Testing" for forum members mean actually shooting enough to get statistically significant results. Your testing appears to mean something different. So, there is a loss of credibility when you say you've done a bunch of testing but don't have results that forum members would expect. The loss in credibility is exacerbated by forum members' experience with others who, from time to time, make extraordinary claims but have no results to back it up.
Different points. [Recognize that I have direct experience only in shooting at targets at known distances from 100 to 600 yards]
Personally, I would not pursue making my bullets more accurate through the consistency from bullet to bullet. There are several custom bullet makers already filling this need very well. And, if I've got it right, there's nothing about your design that would make it easier to have bullet to bullet consistency.
If anything, the advantage of your design is in wind drift and drop at longer distances. That said, the drop numbers that you posted don't appear to me to be significantly different from what's already commercially available. But, since what you posted appeared to be just drop, I'm not certain what they would be if calculated assuming a scope/sights that are above the centerline of the bore and zeroed at 100 yards.
Things to keep in mind/consider:
For disciplines that shoot at targets at known distances, the amount of drop is not a big consideration. If the bullet did retain more velocity and/or wasn't affected in the transonic region AND this enabled a competitor to use a sufficiently significantly reduced so the felt recoil was significantly less, it could be an advantage to the shooter. Palma and long range competitions come to my mind.
For disciplines that shoot at targets that are different distances within the same stage [PRS comes to mind], if the drop and/or wind drift were significantly reduced, this would seem to be an advantage.