• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

How important is one kernel of powder?

Each person in this thread has a different point of view, different experiences, different opinions and is asserting that a different thing is important.

I'm pretty sure we can agree that 1 kernel doesn't matter.

I'll leave it be.

Nooooo!...…........... you can't just leave it be. We are all anxiously awaiting Autotrickler V5 that has 1/2 kernel accuracy.......... ;)
 
Testing for small effects is incredibly difficult. You would have to fire hundreds of shots in controlled conditions to be able to measure the effect of a single kernel of powder.

All groups fired are random samples and no conclusion can be drawn for the root cause of a difference between two groups without first showing that the result was not random chance.

The effect of a single kernel of powder on the mean is very predictable because the physics and math behind it are pretty straightforward.
 
I think it matters more in your head. Especially when you can't account for that flyer. As its all about being consistent and minimising the variables. It probably won't make any noticeable difference but you will always wonder. So why not give yourself one less thing to wonder about.
A fellow shooter once quotedd someone...or perhaps made it up himself; I don'trecall. But what he said was: "Half the stuff we do (with regard to handloading competition ammo) probably doesn't make any difference...we just don't know which half."
 
Nooooo!...…........... you can't just leave it be. We are all anxiously awaiting Autotrickler V5 that has 1/2 kernel accuracy.......... ;)
1/2 kernel accuracy already exists. It just currently isn’t possible with an auto trickler system. U can individually weigh powder to that 1/2 kernel target but u will take some time doing it.
With the Sartorius 503, u can weight to .01-.02 gr. One kernel of Varget is heavier than that. Each powder throw n trickle up will end up at a different end weight that is out of that range. It may take two or three times to hit that small target weight but it can be done. Just takes time. Auto tricklers don’t have that fidelity and doubt they will. They are limited by the per kernel wt. variation of the powder.
 
1/2 kernel accuracy already exists. It just currently isn’t possible with an auto trickler system. U can individually weigh powder to that 1/2 kernel target but u will take some time doing it.
With the Sartorius 503, u can weight to .01-.02 gr. One kernel of Varget is heavier than that. Each powder throw n trickle up will end up at a different end weight that is out of that range. It may take two or three times to hit that small target weight but it can be done. Just takes time. Auto tricklers don’t have that fidelity and doubt they will. They are limited by the per kernel wt. variation of the powder.

Yeah my post was in jest, just to illustrate the never ending obsessiveness we can have with this. The only way an Autotricker could meter to the 1/2 kernel is if it had a kernel cutter built in.

My Sartorius Entris weighs to .001 grains, so if I wanted to I could cut kernels. One kernel of Varget typically weighs .018 to .022 grains. That is useless info, and is now why I use the A&D FX-120i and am happy to be within one kernel, and I do have a method that keeps me to a 1 kernel variance. Not plus or minus one kernel, but one kernel. That is obsessive enough.........
 
Imagine how many variables we, as handloaders, have control over. All depends how far your dedication will take you. Handloaders agonize over the slightest variable and will spend countless dollars to make the "perfect" cartridge. They have total control over said cartridge.

And then they shoot at a target WiThOUT using wind flags. Once that "perfect" round is fired the shooter has no control of it if there is the slightest breeze. Was the breeze the factor that caused the bullet to impact differently or the changes made during handloading?

Wind flags will open your eyes as to the bullet path. They can be as cheap or as expensive as you want.

They were the best investment I made for shooting accurately.
 
"A cartridge that shoots a 50 grain bullet with 10 grains of powder will achieve the same velocity as a cartridge that shoots a 500 grain bullet with 100 grains of powder. (all else equal)." IMO that kind of statement requires hard data to be taken seriously.
 
"A cartridge that shoots a 50 grain bullet with 10 grains of powder will achieve the same velocity as a cartridge that shoots a 500 grain bullet with 100 grains of powder. (all else equal)." IMO that kind of statement requires hard data to be taken seriously.
I don't mean that literally (but I bet it's not far off!). I mean in an idealized theoretical energy balance sort of way. The "all else equal" is VERY important in that statement. I was just illustrating that you can mathematically and explicity show that smaller cartridges are more sensitive using fundamental physics. Intuitively, this is obvious, of course. But you can also prove it (as I did).

The assumptions I made are that the same powder is used in each case and that all of the energy in that powder is turned into the bullet's kinetic energy. In real life that is not the case, but that doesn't matter for the purposes of my earlier post.
 
Well crap I guess I’m out in left field I dropped more powder than I weigh,I can cut one kernel at a time but I don’t really see the purpose, this is the only way I have to load I can’t afford those big high dollar scales.
 

Attachments

  • 3CF32862-AACB-4BBC-835E-F6BB8D7F0676.jpeg
    3CF32862-AACB-4BBC-835E-F6BB8D7F0676.jpeg
    601.6 KB · Views: 53
Well crap I guess I’m out in left field I dropped more powder than I weigh,I can cut one kernel at a time but I don’t really see the purpose, this is the only way I have to load I can’t afford those big high dollar scales.
Well Stan, You “Do” have a wall of “WOOD” !

Since You are a nice guy, I may show You how to accurately weigh to .02 grains with a $25 investment.

But You will have to put down the cigarette ;)
 
When I consider my strategy for handloading, it often incorporates many variables. Chief among them is accuracy and precision. However, there are other variables to consider, such as time, effort, and cost.

I usually ignore cost, because across a long enough timeline, I can always find a way to produce the money required. There's also the experience factor to consider. I really enjoy my time spent at the reloading bench, specifically because of the quality of tools I choose to employ there. The high end machines make it as stress free as possible.

Time and effort can sometimes be mutually exclusive. So I run the strategy through the logic in my brain to determine what level of expected accuracy, precision, or uniformity I am trying to achieve... and weigh that against the time and effort required to get there.

In the case of weighing powder to a single kernel, the Prometheus powder measure allows me to do that faster than any other device, with less effort, and achieves charge uniformity which is unrivaled by any other device. So, there's no reason for me not to throw charges to the exact kernel of powder each time. I know it has produced better results on target than anything else I was using prior. So the justification for me to continue doing it and recommending others do it, is self evident to me.



-----------

 
Also, not sure if this was said above, some barrels are at a length where they would shoot a given load faster, if they were actually cut a bit shorter. That could be thought of as a fairly dead zone where friction and decreasing pressure are close to parity in negating V gain. For those barrel/load combinations, a small increase in powder may actually net zero or a less than expected additional velocity gain, like the extra length is doing.
 
Last edited:
I totally agree - I have seen many benchrest guys dip cases or use a dipper and load right on the bench. 1 kernel means nothing.
As a Short Range Benchrest Shooter, both group and score, I never load at home. Period, Heck, most of the time my loading equipment, minus the powder, just stays in my truck.

I have shot 10-shot “ones” with my Rail Gun where there was 30 FPS difference in the ve,ocities. It just does not matter at 100/200/300 yards.

for years I just threw charges out of a Hensley powder measure. I now use a ChargeMaster Lite. I honestly can’t say that anything has changed.

As 600 to 1000 yards, I think minor differences in the powder charge can make a measurable difference. How much depends on the particulars at the moment.

I will say this. Many guys that are worried about on kernel of powder are shooting bullets that simply don’t know the difference. You can’t shoot 1/4 minutes MOA with 1/2 MOA bullets.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,787
Messages
2,203,180
Members
79,110
Latest member
miles813
Back
Top