dedogs said:Spencer, You are starting to sound to me just a wee bit JEALOUS. If you can't make the shot...don't take it.
You also seem hell bent on painting me as an unnecessary risk taker and a liar. You are entitled to your opinion of course, just as I AM.
By the way if you had very much experience shooting ROCKCHUCKS you would know that they sometimes lay around in the sun for hours NOT MOVING!
Also by the way, I am not advocating every one use my methods. I am simply stating what works for me. And as I said before the question raised is what is your hit ratio and nothing else. I believe I have answered the question.
i do not have any idea where you get jealousy from.
i have shot a few marmots, but they are not legal to kill except during a season in august that is fairly short. yes, they can lay around in the sun for hours, but they are animals and do move, the point was that there are any number of situations out in the field that can cause a shot to miss its mark by less than an inch. especially with a 20gr bullet.
i am not doubting that a head shot on a marmot is an easy task. i am not casting doubt on shooting skills here. but you went to great lengths to proclaim all the downside to a miss, and then several days later tell us all that even with all the potential risks, that you take a shot that has a much greater chance of resulting in a miss. sure, you are probably quite good, but if the risk is losing shooting ground and criminal or civil legal problems, caused by wounding a property owner's prize animal, or hitting someone's house, or just a clean miss, why would anyone take a shot at a 2" target instead of an 8" target.
from one of your earlier posts: "So I don't take the shot if there's a chance I'm going to miss."
regardless how good someone is, a larger target always has a lesser chance of a miss. so if a miss results in a life changing legal problem, why not take the lesser chance?