Possibly, there is an excessive amount of over think here. I would imagine ADI would be embarrassed to have made a batch (lot) of brass having excessive head space that it would not reliably work in all standard chambers. This might get into 5.56X45 vs. .223 chamber issues but cartridge head space should be the same.
Suppose that the USA military, tasked with never ending deployment, had a lot of ammo that was not reliable for any of a number of reasons, excessive head space included, the DOD, US Congress, and military families would be all over Lake City. Making military ammo is serious business and that is why inspectors go over the stuff.
My next project is to rework a large batch of new Lake City 5.54X45 (complete with circle enclosing cross, LC 15, first rate) into .20 Practical - I have done 1000's of rounds using all sorts of new and once fired brass - Winchester, Remington, PPU, Lapua, Nosler, LC, PMC, without any problems. Quick and easy with total confidence in all components used - brass, powder, bullets, and primers. I would guess ADI brass would have similar standards as my LC brass. CCI would also be mortified to hear about any FTF over like .001 percent.
I see much conflicting info regarding the problem.