• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

HBR newbie

Earlier this year I came across an older article by Bob Pease about the start of and history of HBR that inspired me to put this rig together. I had posted this rig on another thread because i got this HBR stock on here but the seller did not know the maker of the stock. Thanks to a few of you veteran HBR shooters I was able to come to the conclusion that I'm pretty sure this stock is a Kelbly's. I already had the barreled action so stuck with it to keep it more along the lines of a "classic" early days HBR rig. It is a trued rem 722 with an 11 twist Shilen select match chambered in 308 Win. Because of the problem with finding 6x HBR scopes, I stuck with my old gold ring 6-18x40 with AO and fine cross hair and I still make the 10 pound weight limit. My question is, with it setup the way it is, and being an 11 twist what bullet would you guys shoot? 150gn match king? I was playing with 168 vlds because that's what I had but I have since shot up all the 168's. I know most of you serious competitors are either making your own bullets or shooting custom bullets in a 30BR. I haven't even shot a registered match at this point. This whole thing was built off of a barreled action that i already had. And being it an 11 twist, that is to fast for a set back an re chamber for 30br.20251025_075626~2.jpg
 
The 308W was all but phased out by the time I became involved with HBR shooting...most opting for a shortened version (30X47 variants). My first effort was with a 308W shortened .165" with no other changes. It shot well. As I remember it, most competitors shooting the 308W in HBR 'in the day' would use the 135-150 gr. bullets in barrels twisted 1:13 or 1:14. based on the 1.080" or 1.150" long jackets. Some of the long time shooters can add to or correct this.

With your barrel, the throat length is going to be the wild card as to whether some of the more commonly available BR quality bullets will reach the lands while still in the case neck...hard to say what reamer was used. Have you had a chance to check that with any of the bullets you've shot so far?

Anyway, I have worked with a couple of vintage full length HBR-type 308's using the 118-125-ish bullets on the 1.00" jackets. Both would shoot .250" five shot groups in good conditions with 748 Winchester and N135 powder. I've used this recipe in well tuned factory guns and it's shoots very well. Hopefully some of the others will chime in with some of their recommendations.

If your free bore length will allow it and you're interested in trying some of the shorter/lighter bullets, let me know and I'll send you some to try.

Yep...that's a Kelbly's stock. Good looking rig! :cool:
 
The 308W was all but phased out by the time I became involved with HBR shooting...most opting for a shortened version (30X47 variants). My first effort was with a 308W shortened .165" with no other changes. It shot well. As I remember it, most competitors shooting the 308W in HBR 'in the day' would use the 135-150 gr. bullets in barrels twisted 1:13 or 1:14. based on the 1.080" or 1.150" long jackets. Some of the long time shooters can add to or correct this.

With your barrel, the throat length is going to be the wild card as to whether some of the more commonly available BR quality bullets will reach the lands while still in the case neck...hard to say what reamer was used. Have you had a chance to check that with any of the bullets you've shot so far?

Anyway, I have worked with a couple of vintage full length HBR-type 308's using the 118-125-ish bullets on the 1.00" jackets. Both would shoot .250" five shot groups in good conditions with 748 Winchester and N135 powder. I've used this recipe in well tuned factory guns and it's shoots very well. Hopefully some of the others will chime in with some of their recommendations.

If your free bore length will allow it and you're interested in trying some of the shorter/lighter bullets, let me know and I'll send you some to try.

Yep...that's a Kelbly's stock. Good looking rig! :cool:
Per Al's hint (red above), presuming that you can reach the lands and maintain a grip on the bullet - say, bullet base >0.125" into the case-neck - despite the 1:11" twist, it is likely that the contemporary (short/light) bullets will shoot tighter than the longer heavier offerings. I began shooting NBRSA registered Hunter tournaments in 1977, at Missoula, MT: everyone but yours truly was shooting full-length .308 (as I recall, that day, I made the 18,Th or, 19Th body).

The lions share of rifles were custom builds, with a few Bob Pease "SPECIALS" (modified Rem.700 Varmint), which featured slabbed (laminated) fore-end and pillar bedding. Of the custom rifles, all but one rig featured pillar bedded WOOD stocks. Before long, I had a BPS, which was used until about 1983. Gene Streits (Sp?) had a 'spanking new' Fred Sinclair built rig nestled in a fiberglass stock (probably a Lee Six/Brown). On that day, Mr. Streits, 'kicked ass'!

Virtually all of the custom rifles featured 1:14", or, 1:15" twist barrels, while the BPS retained the Remington 700 Varmint Special's 1:12" twist. THE bullet of choice was the Sierra 168 Gr. International
Boat-tail Hollow-point. The Sierra 168 remained the primary bullet until 1986, when Clark Green (Sp?) won the NBRSA Hunter Nationals (Austin, TX) using Guy Chism's 150 Gr. FB: within two years, the Sierra offering disappeared from equipment lists, replaced by bullets from Guy, Bob Cauterucio, and Ralph Council.

Also, by then, the full-length .308 was falling, rapidly, from favor, as people were experimenting with shorter, more efficient capacity .30 caliber cases. I believe Mr. Green used a shortened .308 (1.75, or, 1.8" long), and probably Win. 748. The .308 retained a cult, but, after 1986, it was largely 'on life support'. Especially with the light bullets, the shorter cases produce very near the velocity of the full-length .308.

The most popular .308 Win. powders were Win. 748, Win. 760, H-4895, H-380, and later, when the VV became available, N-135 & N-140 were the 'go to' offerings. Today, there are several more suitable powders which may produce the requisite precision.

Even via the relatively 'fast twist' barrel, presuming equal jacket quality (center-of-gravity offset), so long as the jackets hold together (via .308 they will) the lighter bullets are very likely to shoot tighter groups, as there is markedly less offset mass, at not significantly increased RPM due to velocity.

During the late 1980's, or, early 90's, John Bunch, of Texas, conducted a series of experiments related to thirty caliber bullet weight to case capacity: his results were published in PRECISION SHOOTING.
His results provided strong evidence that as case capacity decreased, lighter bullets out performed heavier weights, and vice-versa. Following Mr. Bunch's lead, my own experimenting correlated nicely with his findings: he was, "ahead of his times". There are a LOT of, "somethings to keep in mind".;)

The fun will be in the FINDING OUT! Your rifle may well shoot GREAT - it's cool 'ol rig!!:cool: Keep 'em ON the X! RG
 
Last edited:
@AlNyhus and @RGRobinett Thank you so much for your detailed responses! Since I've delve into this HBR stuff I have followed some of both of your responses in these threads dating back to the early 2000's. Wealth of knowledge in you guys. I'm fairly young (33) and uneducated in HBR but thanks to you guys I have learned much more then I ever would have on my own! After talking to the smith who did the work on my rig I believe the Freebore length on the chamber reamer used for my barrel is .112"
I think I will try some of the 150gn class bullets and a few lighter bullets as well. Again thank you guys so much!
 
I concurre with Al and RG. Even with a faster twist, (like 10 thru 14) the light bullets normally shot in a 17 or 18 twist shoot quite good. Recently rebarrelled one of my HBR rifles with a 14 twist chambered for a 30 IHMSA, thinking I would be shooting longer heavier bullets due to the twist rate. WOW I tried the shorter lighter bullets I normally shoot in my 30 BR, and the test groups were much better than the longer heavier bullets. I was really glad about that, as the recoil is only slightly more than a 30 BR.
Spaulding I would try some light, short (if your chamber throat allows) bullets before you make any changes.
I now wish I had chambered my barrel on 30 BR, would have been fine.

FWIW
Steve Kostanich
 
You're so right, Steve. Even with twist rates of 10-12 (factory twist rates) and a throat long enough to throw a cat through, good short/light .30 bullets will generally shoot amazingly well. This is a factory Howa 308 heavy barrel with the 117's (1.00" jacket) that I make. Just three shots but even adding another 40% for a 5 shot group, that's pretty respectable.
M1j7HeLm.jpg


Good shootin' :) -Al
 
spaulding21, Precision Shooting Magazine published what Dave Brennan titled 'The Bench Rest Shooting Primer'* , which is a collection of some of the best articles from Precision Shooting Magazine. Tucked inside it is a must read article for anyone interested in Hunter/HBR class cartridges. Note that 'Hunter' and 'HBR' are used interchangeably, though one is for the IBS and another for the NBRSA. There are subtle differences but basically......twin sisters from different misters.

The article is from the July 1991 issue and is titled 'Cartridges Of The Hunter Class' by Randy Robinett. This book hasn't been printed for many years. There are, at this time, quite a few copies on ebay for no more than a couple of movie tickets and some popcorn. Hint, hint. ;)


Precision Shooting Magazine has also been digitized by member Stu Redman and is available online. Mr Redman deserves a lot of thanks for doing this. Not all issues are there but he fills in the missing ones regularly.

Will get some 117's and 150's out to you early next week.

Good shootin' :) -Al

*'Primer' is pronounced with a short 'i', not a long 'i'.
 
While we're here, the primary negative attribute of, "over-stabilizing" (NOT possible), or spinning a bullet faster that required to, "put it to sleep" (damping ALL yaw & pitch, thus spinning on axis and aligned with the forces applied), is that there WILL (due to gyroscopic precession) be a larger vertical component associated with wind-drift (missed 'dope')! However, the 'sleeping' bullets will prove very consistent in a good call and execution.

Easiest read: RIFLE ACCURACY FACTS, by Harold R. Vaughn, published by PRECISION SHOOTING, 1998. Chapter 10 Exterior Ballistics, page 197/198, figures 10-13 & 10-14 (ifen ya don't wanna read it all) . . . not being a mathematician, & prior to Mr. Vaughn's effort, I had to read Robert McCoy's work MODERN ERXTERIOR BALLISTICS three times. :p RAF is much easier to follow.

The second, and worst scenario of "too fast a twist", is the potential for jacket/bullet failure, which can be the result of several variables, chief among which is FRICTION, which may produce molten cores: high velocity and "fast twist" (beginning <1:10") may prove frustrating.

When I ordered our initial 1:18" twist thirty caliber barrels (PacNor 5-groove) in the late winter of 1997, it was after absorbing McCoy's work and having obtained a copy of William C. Davis' (Tioga Engineering)
BULLET DESIGN program, then, comparing the DATA with the GREAT on-line option, JBM BALLISTICS, the math was tested: the math is ROCK SOLID.

The original concept was to produce rock-solid Sg1.4 (Std. conditions) with FB bullets of up to 1.050"long (a safety-net for 1.010" long 118 Gr. bullet). There is NO sound reason to employ a barrel which produces Sg less than 1.4, and the GURU recommended Sg1.5 is SOLID GOLD.

Ok, this is all to say that the OPs 1:11" twist will likely produce satisfying, if not excellent groups. RG

P.S. BTW, when using JBM, for point-blank bullets, it is unwise to use the "Miller formula" - that will lead you FAR astray.
 
Last edited:
While we're here, the primary negative attribute of, "over-stabilizing'\" (NOT possible), or spinning a bullet faster that required to, "put it to sleep" (damping ALL yaw & pitch, thus spinning on axis and aligned with the forces applied), is that there WILL (due to gyroscopic precession) be a larger vertical component associated with wind-drift (missed 'dope')! However, the 'sleeping' bullets will prove very consistent in a good call and execution.

Easiest read: RIFLE ACCURACY FACTS, bu Harold R. Vaughn, published by PRECISION SHOOTING, 1998. Chapter 10 Exterior Ballistics, page 197/198, figures 10-13 & 10-14 (ifen ya don't wanna read it all) . . . not being a mathematician, & prior to Mr. Vaughn's effort, I had to read Robert McCoy's work MODERN ERXTERIOR BALLISTICS three times. :p RAF is much easier to follow.

The second, and worst scenario of "too fast a twist", is the potential for jacket/bullet failure, which can be the result of several variables, chief among which is FRICTION, which may produce molten cores: high velocity and "fast twist" (beginning <1:10") may prove frustrating.

When I ordered our initial 1:18" twist thirty caliber barrels (PacNor 5-groove) in the late winter of 1997, it was after absorbing McCoy's work and having obtained a copy of William C. Davis' (Tioga Engineering)
BULLET DESIGN program, and comparing with the GREAT on-line option, JBM BALLISTICS, put the math to work: the math is ROCK SOLID. The original concept was to produce rock-solid (Std. conditions) Sg1.4 with FB bullets of up to 1.050"long (a safety-net for 1.010" long 118 Gr. bullet).
There is NO sound reason to employ a barrel which produces Sg less than 1.4, and the GURU recommended Sg1.5 is SOLID GOLD.

Ok, this is all to say that the OPs 1:11" twist will likely produce satisfying, if not excellent groups. RG

P.S. BTW, when using JBM, for point-bland bullets, it is unwise to use the "Miller formula" - that will lead you FAR astray.
Excellent information…Thank you!!!
 
Spaulding21- all that is posted her is solid information, if you are going to stay with this 308 Win 11 twist and you have noted you will try 150 grain bullets I will suggest a powder that could work- it sure did for me. I shot a lot of IMR 4350 using Sierra 168's and Chism 150 grain bullets, I know this is not a common powder for most but was advised to me by Ron Hoehn as he had success with it. I won a bunch of matches with 44 grains and a Sierra 168 bullet.
Wayne Corley
 
Listen to what RG and Wayne have to say. Go look at their Hall of Fame points in Hunter.

 
If I recall the chamberings that were allowed had to have a minimum case capacity similar to a 30/30. Is that right and is it still the requirement? I somehow had it in mine that 30BR didn't make the minimum. I've wanted to make my 6PPC into a small 30 of some kind, but it has a PPC bolt face and would have even less capacity than a 30BR. Would Mike's 30 made on a Grendel case qualify?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,079
Messages
2,246,552
Members
80,965
Latest member
Blados33
Back
Top