Has anyone tried necking down a 260 Remington to 25cal and used a 135gr Berger hybrid? Gives equivalent G7 BC to the 6.5mm 144gr hybrid with less recoil. I know 25 Souper, but it just seems easier from a 260 Remington case. A 260AI down to 25cal looks even more interesting...
Tangent -
Howdy !
Trying to form a notional .25” cal wildcat case from .260AI parent brass would be problematic, IMHO.
The sharp Ackley Improved shoulder angle would present at least some challenge in the
mechanical case forming process; towards arriving @ the desired final .25” calibre.
I am wondering how far downward on the neck, one could truly size the OD to; because of things like die or bushing entry hole sizes…. where the sizing takes place.
Another consideration would be whether the chosen / existing “ .260AI brass “ had enough starting neck wall thickness to still provide the desired amount of final neck wall thickness…. after necking it down to .25” cal? How thick do you want the final neck walls to be ?
I say this because -
I formed some sample 6.5mm wildcat brass for a shooter in NZ, who hunted Tar on the South Island. He wanted fairly thick neck walls for his wildcat…itself a design that had some features of both the 6.5 X 47L and the 6.5Creedmoor. The first case tried was .260 Remington, but the final formed wildcat had neck walls thinner than the shooter wanted.
When trying to form same wildcat cases from 7-08 brass, the final formed cases still had too thin case neck walls; to meet the shooter’s desired spec.
The brass shortage/hording was in fulll swing @ the time, and no virgin .308 Win brass could be sourced. I was able to source .358Win brass, and the subsequent multiple calibre neck-downs resulted in wildcat cases/ thick enough neck walls to permit
neck “ turning “ the the final thickness sought.
YRMV.
With regards,
357Mag