All the top shooters seem to shoot something like a 284 Wincheter. 223 is a poor choice for distance.Your numbers for your recipe and context are as good or better than most.
223/556 is one of the more difficult cartridges to get low SD/ES based on context.
While some folks will try it in F-T/R, they are not shooting 77 SMK or typical loads or barrels. So, when they get good waterlines at 1000 yards, it is usually a heavier bullet (like 80, 80.5s 85s or 90s) in a heavy, long, match barrel and high pressure loads. It is still a challenge, brass life is very short, and that is why most folks will just go the 308 route.
So, unless you want to run a similar pattern and recipe as the fullbore or F-T/R folks, you can't expect their numbers.
You will probably be able to find more than a few threads about 223/556 and getting the SD/ES down. Just keep in mind that those 1000 yard folks are not shooting 77 grain bullets or short barrels.
I mean I do prefer shooting my fire breathing dragon 7-300 Win mag with 180g ELDMs at 3100 for serious long range work, but at the cost of 10x less barrel life, 3x the powder charge, 2x the bullet prices, and 10x the recoil. See where I'm going with this? Haha.All the top shooters seem to shoot something like a 284 Wincheter. 223 is a poor choice for distance.
Poor choice but it's a lot of fun trying!All the top shooters seem to shoot something like a 284 Wincheter. 223 is a poor choice for distance.
Amen. There are a lot of divides between people's different methods. There is no substitute for figuring some of that stuff out on one's own. Like whether to ream flash holes, use moly, etc., etc. just have to try those things out and form one's own opinion, I think.But on the flip side I figured out which dogma was just not true.
The smaller the case, the harder it is to have low es/sd numbers.I wonder if the 22br, 22 Grendel, 22 arc, et al have the same issues as the 223 in relation to consistent low sd and es?
Also, is the 22br the “easy button” just like the 6br?