And politically convenient. Not a damn one of them, especially that "leader" of the Texas public safety was there in the fog of the incident.
Lets cut right to it. You can't see thru walls. You can't shoot indiscriminately. You can't breach walls and doors without equipment (ask any cop driving a cruiser with 150,000 miles on it about equipment). When a shooter goes to ground (a barricaded subject with, or without hostages) you isolate, secure, work to gain the advantage, negotiate if you have to, try to save the people nearby.
It is not a wrong approach, unless of course it is two days later and you are not the responding officer and you are standing in front of a hostile crowd of parents and reporters. THEN it's the wrong choice. THAT is cowardice.
It is not cowardice to run in. It is not cowardice to seek cover from overwhelming ballistic advantage. It is not cowardice to believe that the shooter is now holding hostages but shooting at you and not them. Of course you try to get the shot. But is you can't...you need the right equipment or you are now part of the losses.
It is cowardice to say "what we know now is they shoulda woulda coulda...
I'll bet my sandwich that hack is a political appointee.
And lastly, to stand outside is called securing a perimeter. It sucks. But somebody has to do it.
I find it amazing that fellow shooters, guys who use tools peacefully everyday that those cops had to use "for real" can so quickly blame the cops. Funny thing is, I don't recall seeing any of you on my calls in the 20 years I was the pointy end. But I saw a lot of damn brave guys in uniform next to me.
Give the blue a break guys.