• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

'Flex' bipod

memilanuk

Gold $$ Contributor
Been meaning to do this for a while now... with the proliferation of 'wide' bipods for competitive F/TR shooting, we've been seeing a lot of cool gear hitting the market. Pretty much anything you can think of, someone is either making it or working on how to make it. One that seems to stay under the radar thus far is the 'Flex' bipod by Dan Pohlabel.

2013-01-31130026_zps81814c06.jpg


It's a very simple design... no mariners wheel for vertical adjustment, no joystick head, no changing width as it goes up and down... it is very light (as are most, these days) but also very durable. I haven't actively tried to destructively test it (generally, I don't have to; it just 'happens' - one of my talents ;) )but so far it's held up to being tossed in the back of the truck, hauled around to the range and everywhere else in between, etc. Definitely has not been 'babied' in any way, and its not noticeably any worse for wear. An added bonus is that it breaks down *very* flat for airline travel. Take the 'feet' off, take out the ratchet lever w/ screw, and it nestles very nicely in the bottom layer of foam in my gun case (with necessary cuts for the head, etc.) I'm definitely not worried about it mechanically in there - if they bash the case hard enough to damage what is essentially a plate of spring steel... I've likely got bigger worries.

2013-01-31130050_zps115f3be0.jpg


This view shows a bit of the adjustment controls. Each leg has independent control for height, and there is a ratcheting locking lever that controls the cant. Instead of being directly centered like most other designs I've seen, this one is off-set a little, allowing a fair amount of movement without allowing it to completely 'flop' over to one side. Being as I've had guns literally flip over as they tipped over too far using other designs... I can appreciate this quite a bit. Also having the tilt control relatively close/tight to the bore of the gun helps with the stability as well.

2013-01-31130000_zpsd4cd1470.jpg


Dan's original use was up in his locale of Ohio, where apparently grassy firing lines are the norm. Here in the PNW... I seem to encounter concrete or gravel more often myself, which is why I usually shoot off some sort of matt under the 'pod to keep it from sinking in too far. Dan's newest models have feet with some teeth to 'em to give better traction on hard surfaces such as the hard-pack clay/dirt under the skim of gravel @ Raton NM...

Why would you want more traction? Well... not every body wants a 'pod that slides around like a hog on ice. Some people manage to get things tracking straight back and forth, almost like it was constrained by a front rest. Personally, I have a hard time doing that in a repeatable fashion. While the Flex Bipod will shoot quite well with such a hold, what it was intended for was those of us who like to 'lean' into the gun a bit. Quite literally, the idea is that you get the feet to dig in slightly, and push against the rifle butt with your shoulder and the bipod will 'flex' or bow forward slightly. It is one of those things that sounds wonky until you try it... and it may take a few times to get a feel for it... but once you do, it is surprisingly repeatable.

The system does have a few quirks to it... personally I'd rather the rail attachment used another ratchet lever like the pivot control rather than requiring a separate tool to take it on/off the gun. Also... these bipods seem to work better mounted somewhat further back than other designs, and some experimenting may be necessary to find what works best for you. Then again, we all need more trigger time... ;)


Please see the linked PDF below for a computer drawing of the bipod, along with brief instructions and Dan's email address if you're interested.

Flex Bipod PDF
 
That looks interesting Monte. What's the weight?

The link only gives a PDF of a drawing, no other information, so far as I can see.
 
Tried that but it didn't work with Google Chrome as a browser. It does though with Firefox which is the opposite to the usual situation. Anyway, seen it now thanks.
 
I've put this review up in the Daily Bulletin and I "grabbed" the info text that appears in the PDF. You can find everything in one place here:

http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/02/new-flex-f-tr-bipod-from-dan-pohlabel/

Here is Dan's info:

The bipod feet are shipped loose. Note there is a left foot and a right foot. Mount them as shown in the diagram above. Determine the balance point of your rifle and mount the bipod approximately two inches forward of that point. You may want to move it further forward after shooting. Experiment with its placement to minimize movement of the bipod. When setting up, first grab each foot and ‘dig’ them in to the shooting surface, dirt, gravel, grass, carpet — it doesn’t matter. After making sure each foot has a hold, raise or lower the bipod to your target and use the cant adjustment to level your rifle. Loading the bipod with your shoulder is the preferred method of position. Contact me with any FLEX bipod questions you may have: danielp123 [at] earthlink.net.
 
Well... personally I have a devil of a time with the Sinclair bipod, either Gen II or III. It doesn't seem to like being 'loaded' at *all*. I think people who shoot well with it either pull the gun back into their shoulder or use a neutral (almost free-recoil) hold - neither of which seem to work repeatably for me. Obviously they work just fine for other people.

Most of my 'target' rifles have some sort of rail slot in the fore-end, so I prefer that method of attachment. The bipod stud system on the Sinclair has aggravated me more than once. The overall range of adjustment from side to side on the Sinclair is greater, if that matters for your shooting locale.
 
memilanuk said:
Well... personally I have a devil of a time with the Sinclair bipod, either Gen II or III. It doesn't seem to like being 'loaded' at *all*. I think people who shoot well with it either pull the gun back into their shoulder or use a neutral (almost free-recoil) hold - neither of which seem to work repeatably for me. Obviously they work just fine for other people.

Most of my 'target' rifles have some sort of rail slot in the fore-end, so I prefer that method of attachment. The bipod stud system on the Sinclair has aggravated me more than once. The overall range of adjustment from side to side on the Sinclair is greater, if that matters for your shooting locale.

We are still wondering how heavy is it and what does it cost.
 
I can weight mine, but I think it was right around 20 oz. I used flex pod in 2012 after seeing Dan use it at the 2011 Nats.
I needed a light pod because my gun weight was up there, and this one seemed to fit the bill. I think I shot only 2 TR matches in 2012, and won both using this bi-pod. Herb Edwards used one at last months OKC 600 yard match and says he wouldn't shoot anything else. (he did really well with it) I use mine considerably farther forward on my stock then what is recommended, but never really tried it in the 2" front of balance position. May-be I'm missing somthing and will try it out in that location.

Honestly I don't shoot FTR enough, so it seems like every time I do, I struggle just a little bit overcoming the felling of using a bi-pod, (and remembering how I used my hold the last time out) and Dan's bipod allows me to get on track quickly. The one thing I do remember is if I load the flex bipod, as instructed, giving it a firm hold but not a death grip the verticle was very small. When I soft hold and let it recoil into my shoulder it opened the verticle up.
 
Thanks to Monte and Jim for sharing their experience with the "Flex Bipod", it is an unusual design and doesn't appeal to everyone. I designed it originally in 2010 and made changes to it that entire season to improve stability and minimize any movement of the feet during recoil. It is a simple design, the flex plate deflects easily and allows the feet to remain in position during the string of fire. This means the shooter only needs to reposition the rear of the rifle to regain the target and fire the next shot. I know of one Flex Bipod shooter that is able to watch his bullet trace through the scope, of course he is a "big guy" and the recoil doesn't move him around as much behind the rifle. At 145 lbs. I don't have that experience but I only reposition myself slightly after recoil. As Monte stated, this is a simple yet lightweight design that has proved very durable. I'm a believer that "simple is better".
Dan Pohlabel
 
I shot Herb's set up in OKC last month and was very impressed with how the rifle tracks with the Flex Pod. No bounce, no having to move anything back and forth, sideways that is, after a shot. I watched with glee as the bullet tracked right to the target. It seemed to even help with recoil.

I had the pleasure of shooting on the same target with Dan at Nationals last year. He's one of those guys that after you are around a couple of minutes, you realize you need to shut up and listen because this guy is sharper than a tack. I took some of the things we talked about while in the pits and applied them to my program and got some much needed benefits. Just another example of what I said about the guy you are trying to beat being the first one to help you.

I'm patiently awaiting the arrival my flex-pod, just hope it gets here before the Texas State Long Range match.

Dean Wheeler
 
Just to bring a update to the thread today I shot a f-class match with the " Flex Bipod " and all I can say is it is a VAST improvement from my former bipod for "MY TECHNIQUE AND STYLE OF SHOOTING" it may not apply to anyone else. I was able to hold a very tight waterline and if i can just read the mirage and flags a bit better my scores would improve.

Just want to give thanks Dan thanks for his bipod.
 
eric32 said:
Just to bring a update to the thread today I shot a f-class match with the " Flex Bipod " and all I can say is it is a VAST improvement from my former bipod for "MY TECHNIQUE AND STYLE OF SHOOTING" it may not apply to anyone else. I was able to hold a very tight waterline and if i can just read the mirage and flags a bit better my scores would improve.

Just want to give thanks Dan thanks for his bipod.

I've used Dan's bipod myself for the last couple months, I like it also....... ;)
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,248
Messages
2,214,764
Members
79,495
Latest member
panam
Back
Top