• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Fireform Brass Loads - Looking for Opinions

Shynloco

You can lead a horse to water, but ........
Morning Folks,

I shoot strictly paper these days and just bought some new Lapua Brass for my .308. My question is this....what do you guys think of dropping my powder load by about 2 - 2.5 grs from my "Accuracy Load" since I'm only interested in fireforming my brass this time? I know I'm giving up some 200 - 300 fps in velocity, but who cares. I'm not looking to shoot for score. And I'm also changing from Sierra 168 gr HPBT to Nosler 168 Gr HPBT for this round of fire. Any comments are welcomed. Thx guys.
 
Assuming this is 'fireforming' Lapua .308 brass to be used in a gun chambered in .308 Winchester, and the load was originally developed using Lapua brass... I'd say its a complete and utter waste of time and components. Load that stuff up with your match load and go shoot. You may have to adjust the load *slightly* from virgin to fired brass, but we're talking a few tenths to a half grain *max*, not 2-2.5gn. I wouldn't reduce it that much even going from a load worked up in Winchester brass to virgin Lapua cases - maybe a grain, if that.
 
+1 to the above post,
Most guns shoot better than most people. load'm like your match load and use the time to work on the "shooter" skills.
 
Shynloco said:
Morning Folks, I shoot strictly paper these days and just bought some new Lapua Brass for my .308. My question is this....what do you guys think of dropping my powder load by about 2 - 2.5 grs from my "Accuracy Load" since I'm only interested in fireforming my brass this time? I know I'm giving up some 200 - 300 fps in velocity, but who cares. I'm not looking to shoot for score. And I'm also changing from Sierra 168 gr HPBT to Nosler 168 Gr HPBT for this round of fire. Any comments are welcomed. Thx guys.

Since the internal capacity of new brass is smaller than that of fully formed brass it makes since to reduce the load slightly when fire forming for the first two times. "Don't forget to but a little oil on the outside of the case for the first fire forming to prevent the case from grabbing the chamber and give inconsistent lengths." (this last sentence from the newly minted Benchrest Hall of Fame shooter Jack Neary.) After that, load them to "your" barrel's tuned load, not some book's accuracy load.
 
Thanks for the comments and ideas. Perhaps to clarify, I'm from the "Old School" of reloading. Sometimes I assume things (bad idea) or take for granted about my reloading, when I post. To answer just a few issues raised, yes my Ruger M77V (Bull Barreled) is chamberd for Win .308 and when I used the term "Accuracy Load", I am not referring to what some loading manual states, but am referring to the load that I've developed for my particular weapon that produces sub-MOA groups @ 100 yds that are measured in .200 - .300 groupings. But now and then, I guess my brain wanders when thinking about what would happen "if." Hence the question I posted and I really appreciate you guys sharing both your experiences and ideas. After all, at my age (63), I still chasing that 5 shot one holer in every one of my weapons. I'm darn close with most of them, but haven't gotten there yet. And I learned a long time ago, no one person has all the answers, at least not one that walks the earth. The other thing, is I'm never too old to learn something new. So thanks to all of you and keep sharing your ideas. Never know when your idea may be the one that works for me the best in achieving my goals.
 
Shynloco

I have a brand new Stevens 200 in .243 and also asked here about which methods for fireforming brass. I asked because some of my new Winchester cases are .006 shorter than minimum headspace (1.630) This puts the new cases at 1.624 and I wanted to prevent stretching and thinning in the web area. The answer here I liked best was to just seat your bullets hard into the rifling and drop a few grains off your load.

If you go to the very front of this web page and type in fireforming in the search the site block you will get loads and methods for your question.

http://www.6mmbr.com/index.html

snapshot34b.jpg


snapshot35b.jpg
 
My thoughts are that unless you are shooting in serious competition, to just treat the new cases like fireformed ones. I've just set aside my first box of Lapua 6BR after five firings to be annealed, and started on a fresh box from the same brass lot. I do run them through the Bushing/Bump die with an expander to open the necks up a touch, but that is it for prep.

Just a subjective opinion but I think the fresh unfired box may be shooting slightly better, than my 5X fired ones. Out of curiosity, I quickly measured up some. The fresh brass is 0.002" smaller in diameter than my 5X brass measured at the shoulder. I bump the shoulder back 0.001" on the fired cases. The shoulder on the fresh unfired brass is .002" shorter than the fired bumped brass. So in both directions 0.002" extra clearance. However, the neck of loaded rounds still only has about 0.0025" clearance in both the fired and unfired condition. The only advantage to the fired is that I leave about one third of the neck unsized so it probably only has about 0.001" clearance.

Like I say, given the cost of loads, time at the range, and life of the barrel, I would shoot them with your normal accuracy loads, and expect them to perform well. If you sort your brass by volume then I would wait until they are fired at least once.

Hope that helps,
 
RonAKA,
In the past, I've always firefromed my brass regardless of the manufacturer. That being said, my Lapua Brass has produced my best groups, even with my .308. And as we all know, there is less variance with Lapua although I trust nobody's products to be uniform throughout. So being anal as I am. I always check my lengths, neck thickness, shoulders, etc, etc. I also run every casing through my Wilson NS dies and closely monitor any out of round necks due to dings, etc and run those through both my Redding NS Die (no mandrals in Wilson Dies to push out dings) and then through the Wilson so as all the neck sizes are equally sized. So I'm gonna take the suggests by everybody not to waste time and money and load up ten of my new Lapuas with the accuracy load and see how they group. Just for comparison, I'm loading ten Sierras and ten Noslers just to see how the Noslers work. I already know what three and five time load Lapuas with Sierra do - F A N T A S T I C. And the only person I compete against SERIOUSLY is myself and thats each time I hit the range.
There is one last thing I keep seeing guys write about and that is trying to "limit" the "stretching of their brass." That is one thing that just doesn't seem to register any sense with me because as I understand, your brass is ONLY going to stretch up to and including the size of your chamber and there ain't Jack you can do to prevent that unless you have a set of custom made dies made that match your chamber. In other words, you cannot prevent stretching unless your loading components are in perfect sizing with your chamber. Any thoughts?
 
It's not like you're forming 6MMAR from Grendel or 7.62X39 brass. It's 308 brass in a 308 so difference will be minimal. Personally I've never worried about using a reduced load in forming, sure the case capacity is smaller when it's not formed but it takes a heck of a lot less than the maximum pressure the load's going to produce to kick that brass out to the chamber walls - the chamber walls are what's determining the ultimate case capacity, not the brass.

I think you'd be wasting money and components but if you're getting trigger time and practice while doing it and not just popping them off to pop them off then it's worth it. I wouldn't bother reducing by any more than 1/2 grain though, if you truly are worried about those few thousands of a difference in virgin to fired brass, using a reduced load's going to dampen the quality of the forming.

Wayne
 
Shynloco said:
There is one last thing I keep seeing guys write about and that is trying to "limit" the "stretching of their brass." That is one thing that just doesn't seem to register any sense with me because as I understand, your brass is ONLY going to stretch up to and including the size of your chamber and there ain't Jack you can do to prevent that unless you have a set of custom made dies made that match your chamber. In other words, you cannot prevent stretching unless your loading components are in perfect sizing with your chamber. Any thoughts?

If you're interested in as much accuracy as you can obtain, given some of the limitations of your rifle, the next time you wear out your barrel, consider ordering a new barrel with a 308 minimum neck (no turn) chamber.

Shilen http://www.shilen.com/chambers.html offers 308 barrels with three chambers: the 308 Win., 308 Win. (.332") tight neck, and the 308 Win. (.340") minimum neck.

I intend to have my son's 308 chambered for the .340" minimum neck since he has shown little interest in turning necks. With Lapua brass consistency, and lining up everything as much as possible on the imaginary axis that runs through the center of the barrel, you give yourself the greatest chance of reducing group size. With a loaded round of .337", in a .340" neck chamber we'll have total clearance of .003" or .0015" clearance on each side.

No need for custom dies. We're using a Redding Type S Bushing die which Redding told me is made to Minimum SAMMI specs. All I'm doing is buying a Neck Chamber that more closely matches my loaded No Turn round.
 
Shynloco said:
There is one last thing I keep seeing guys write about and that is trying to "limit" the "stretching of their brass." That is one thing that just doesn't seem to register any sense with me because as I understand, your brass is ONLY going to stretch up to and including the size of your chamber and there ain't Jack you can do to prevent that unless you have a set of custom made dies made that match your chamber. In other words, you cannot prevent stretching unless your loading components are in perfect sizing with your chamber. Any thoughts?

I really don't see much problem with a one time stretch to let the case fit your particular chamber. After that if you just neck size and minimal bump, you keep that perfect fit without any further stretching.

The other is to headspace to the Lapua unfired brass dimension to minimize initial stretch. That could work too, if you only neck size and bump after that.
 
RonAKA said:
I really don't see much problem with a one time stretch to let the case fit your particular chamber. After that if you just neck size and minimal bump, you keep that perfect fit without any further stretching. The other is to headspace to the Lapua unfired brass dimension to minimize initial stretch. That could work too, if you only neck size and bump after that.

Instead of neck sizing, and bump sizing, in two separate operations, with two different tools, why not full length size with a bushing type die each and every time we size? What does the competitive benchrest community know that we don't?
 
Neary is a 6PPC shooter, and the difference in capacities of the .220 Russian, and a 6PPC chamber pretty effectively limit fire forming pressure, if the powder used to fire form is suitable for a normal PPC load. Additionally, because of the amount of pull back that takes place in this particular fire forming, and the typical lengths of 6PPC chambers it is particularly desirable to follow a procedure that makes the longest (overall case length) brass. Taking Jack's acvice as universal, for all calibers is, not a good idea. I do not think that it was his intent. It is almost universally recommended that ammunition and chambers be free of lubricant. I would say that this is particularly the case when there is only a slight change in case dimensions on first firing. Shooters do not generally have the tools to measure chamber pressure, and advice given on the internet goes to the world. The issue is excess bolt thrust, not only as a one time event, but as cumulative effects.
 
To both Outdoorsman and RonAKA,
Thanks for the detailed info about the barrel change consideration as well as Ron's fireforming thoughts. With my Lapua Brass, since it is only fired out of MY .308 and no other rifle, I have only been neck sizing and bumping shoulders (which is rarely needed) in 3 & 5 times fired Lapua. Now I absolutely hate bragging and I'm not one to do it...usually, but I've found after testing loads, that my particular rifle LOVES Lapua Brass loaded with 42 Gr Varget, Sierra 168 gr HPBT, using CCI Benchrest Large Rifle Primers with a bullet seating depth of 3.230 (Ojive Measurement). Whether it was my lucky day, all the conditions were perfect or who knows what, about 3+ weeks ago I went to the range to test Varget powder from having previously used RE15 and testing Vihta Vhori N133 (used in my 6mmbr) & N135. I fired four rounds at two targets set @ 100yds. After a few cold shots (with about 3 minutes between rounds)to warm and normalize the barrel, I fired for score with a friend watching and spotting. I almost fell off my shooting stool because after scoring both targets, the first target had a spread of .214 and the second .260. I mean gents, I've never in 27 yrs of owning that Ruger M77V with a Factory Bull Barrel shot that tight a group, not even when my eye-sight was 10 times better. So either I found the perfect load for her or I was just damn lucky and the stars aligned. When it comes to target shooting, I crave and work toward that 5 shot-one holer. Heck that .308 shot better that day than does my Savage 6mmbr where the best she's shot is a .318 spread.
But to all, thanks for your input. And Outsdoorman, don't know how much longer that barrel will last, but when the time comes, I'll definitely look into that Shilen you mentioned. Wouldm't that be great if that barrel made my "one-holer" dreams come true considering it would come from a general production weapon and not some super expensive custom job I simply cannot afford.

Thx Guys.
 
Outdoorsman,
Let me answer your question by saying that I may well be anal in my reloading and somewhat of perfectionist, I certainly don't have the knowledge, the expertise or the smarts that some of you folks have. To that extent, I have to rely on reading material and listening to the advice offered to me by various folks, such as yourself. Now I haven't been reloading anywhere nearly as long as I've been shooting weapons which is right at 50 yrs. But I just started reloading about two years ago and am playing catchup on knowledge and information. And frankly, some of the information is over my head probably because I'm just don't possess the smarts to understand it all. But something that has been told me by shooting partners (some experienced Benchrest Shooters) and even in books I've read when speaking of "full length sizing," I've learned to LIMIT the number of times I full length size because it tends to overwork the ENTIRE casing unnecessarily. If I am hearing and understanding you right, you advocate full length sizing each time. I do it the way I do because my brass will last longer. The proof of this is shown to me in the life of my 6mmbr brass (Lapua) that I have NEVER full length sized (fireformed it) and I just loaded it for the 17th time. So I do not necessary disagree with what you are saying, but I do my reloading like I do because it seems to work very successfully.
Now perhaps because its a different caliber and I'm not using Lapua Brass or whatever, I'm only getting 4 reloads out of 22-250 using Winchester brass that I full length size each time and experience head separation after the four shootings. Go figure.
At any rate, thanks for your thoughts. I certainly don't claim to know it all and welcome all thoughts and advice people are willing to offer.
 
Boyd Allen,
Thx for the information. Now if you read some of my posts ahead of this one, you'll note that I'm not exactly the sharpest pencil in the drawer and don't fully understand some of the detail that folks present to me. As such, certain terminology leaves me lacking for a full understand of what was said. I get your drift on most of what you said, but please explain what you meant when you said, "....because of the amount of pull back that takes place...." Are you referring to the casing movement in the chamber or something different that occurs in the rifle? I'd appreciate clarification on that issue.
But certainly thanks for your post and I am aware of Neary and his writings and accomplishments. If only I had the smarts he and all you guys have.

Thx again.
 
Shynloco

I asked my fireforming question here because I was worried my new cases might stretch in the web area and become warped and banana shaped. I asked my question because I primarily shoot milsurp Enfield .303 rifles with chambers the size of blimp hangars. After asking my question here I went back a checked my cases that some of which were over 30 years old that had been fired in my commercial rifle chambers only. I checked them with a RCBS Case Mastering Gauge for thinning in the web area and found no thinning or stretching in the web area (ZERO)

For hunting I would only use new or once fired brass and "NO" special fireforming techniques were used (load as normal and fire) New cases were loaded with loads that were slightly below or near maximum for hunting. The only times I had problems with new brass was when firing commercial cases in military chambers at higher pressures, and these cases would stretch and warp.

Below is a good article on the different resizing methods, accuracy and case life. Also remember you have a standard commercial chamber and the majority of the answers given here are by shooters with competitive rifles with "custom" sized chambers.

"From: bartbob@aol.com (Bartbob)
Newsgroups: rec.guns
Subject: Re: Bottleneck Cases - Seating and headspace
Date: 11 Jan 1996 09:34:11 -0500

Your questions about reloading the .308 Winchester are good.

Headspace for the .308 Winchester, as well as other rimless, bottleneck cases, is measured from the closed bolt's face to a datum point on the shoulder. This datum point for the .308 Win. is .400-inch. Minimum .308 Win. chamber headspace is 1.630-inch. Maximum is about 1.650-inch. New cases typically measure about 1.628-inch from case head to the shoulder's datum point so they will easily fit in minimum-headspace chambers, yet not stretch in firing enough to cause head separation problems when fired in a maximum-headspace chamber. New cases typically end up with a fired-case headspace dimension of about .001-inch shorter than the chamber's actual headspace.

Headspace is measured with steel gages precision ground to specific dimensions. They are put in the rifle's chamber, then the bolt is gently closed. If the chamber is too short and a minimum gage is used, the bolt won't fully close; the chamber must be lengthened with a reamer to fix the problem as new cases may not allow the bolt to be closed. If the chamber headspace is between the minimum and maximum limits,then the minimum gage will let the bolt easily close. If a maximum gage is put in the chamber, the bolt should not be able to close which verifies the chamber headspace is within manufacturing limits for safe use with new cases. But if the bolt closes on a maximum gage, chamber headspace is too long and new cases may rupture if fired in such a chamber. Minimum gages are called "go" gages, maximum gages are called "no-go" gages based on the idea that a the bolt should "go" closed on a go-gage and "no-go" closed on a no-go gage.

Bottleneck sized- or new-case headspace can be measured with a gage such as the RCBS Precision Mic. A case is put head-down in the gage, then a micrometer thimble is screwed on and tightened until it stops against the shoulder. The gage is read in thousandths of an inch. Loaded rounds can also be measured with such gages.

Here's what was learned back in the 1960s about sizing cases. It applies to the .308 as well as other rounds of similar size. Tests were conducted with super-accurate .308 Win. match rifles. Chamber headspace was 1.630-inch,or minimum. Rifles were held in an unrestricted machine rest. An unrestricted machine rest clamps the rifle's forend and butt much like it would be held by someone. On firing, it moves with the same resistance for each shot. It slides on three steel rods riding in V-blocks and moves about 3 inches when fired. The upper cradle is moved back forward against a stop after each shot and repositions the rifle exactly the same for each shot. Such machine rests eliminates all human variables in holding and are commonly used by bullet making companies and military arsenals for accuracy testing. Sometimes only a barreled action is clamped in the rest; pictures of such machine rests are shown in Sierra's reloading manual. The US Olympic Shooting Team uses similar ones for testing .22 rimfire match rifles and ammunition as they know humans can't test them as well as the rest can.

Such tests are much, much better than shooting a highpowered rifle from a bench because of one important, but little known reason. The more recoil a rifle has, the more very, very slight changes in how it's held effect how it moves as the bullet goes down the barrel; very small changes cause the barrel axis to be different for each shot as the bullet leaves. Rifles used in 100 to 300 yard benchrest matches shoot mild cartridges with small powder charges and light bullets which are shot in virtually free-recoil conditions unimpeded by differences in holding which is near machine rest conditions. When held firmly like rifles shooting larger, more powerful cartridges have to be, they typically shoot much larger groups than the sub 1/4th-MOA ones they are famous for. Rifles tested in machine rests typically have groups with smaller spreads between largest and smallest ones than when conventionally benchrested. What this means is that most highpowered rifles actually shoot better than conventional benchrest techniques show.

The .308 rifles fired in a machine rest would shoot about 1/2-MOA test groups with cases sized correctly for best accuracy. Note that twenty or more shots were fired for each group. When hand-held and shouldered from a typical benchrest with the rifle's forend and stock toe on sand bags, the groups would be in the 1 MOA range. Here's a summary of what was learned from these tests.

When a full-length sizing die was set in the reloading press as instructions said, sized cases had a head-to-shoulder headspace typically shorter than a new case. When fired, these cases produced test groups about 1.5-MOA. Note that the die was set in the press such that its bottom just touched the shellholder as the ram was at the top of its movement. This caused the case shoulder to be set back so the sized-case headspace dimension was typically shorter than that of a new case. Such instructions supplied with reloading presses and dies are required for two reasons regarding chambers with minimum headspace dimensions. First, the great variety of chamber sizes for a given cartridge vary quite a bit and the manufacturer wants to be sure sized cases will chamber properly. Second, the amount of case lube applied causes sized-case headspace to vary several thousandths of an inch; lightly lubed cases will have a longer headspace and the manufacturer wants to be sure cases so sized will fit in minimum headspace chambers. Cases so sized could be reloaded about 10 times before their head separation became imminent.

Fired cases partially sized in a full-length sizing die with about three-fourths of the neck sized produced test groups about 1.5-MOA groups. Cases so sized had their body diameter's reduced a couple of thousandths of an inch which moved the shoulder forward several thousandths of an inch. These partially-sized cases were actually longer in head-to-shoulder datum point dimension than the chamber's headspace dimension. A slight binding was noted as the rounds were chambered. Case life of these cases was about 20 to 30 reloads.

Fired cases that were neck-only sized in dies that didn't have their body diameters reduced but their necks were sized down would shoot groups about 1-MOA groups. Subsequent firings of the same case resulted in its shoulder moving forward enough to cause very slight binding as the bolt was closed and groups opened up about 1/4th MOA with such cases. About 30 to 40 reloads per case was possible.

New, never fired cases produced test groups about 3/4ths-MOA even with all their irregularities from manufacturing. The smallest test groups came from cases full-length sized such as the shoulder was not set back from it fired position. Sized-case headspace was the same as, or not more than .001-inch shorter than fired-case headspace. Test groups were about 1/2 MOA. And cases could be reloaded 20 to 30 times.

This well explains why most folks get better accuracy with partial-sized cases using full-length sizing dies than by following press/die instructions for full-length sizing. It also explains why they get better accuracy with neck-only sized cases compared to conventional full-length sizing with the die set according to supplied instructions.

It should be mentioned that the machine-rest tests were made at 600 yards. Had the tests been done at 100 yards, the smallest groups would have been about 2/10ths-MOA and the largest ones about 3/4ths-MOA. In one test, 40 consecutive shots were fired into just under 2 inches at 600 yards. To do that well, the group at 100 yards would have to be about 1/10th MOA.

By using a sized-case headspace gage like the RCBS Precision Mic, you can set a full-length sizing die in a press such that it sizes the cases just enough to set the shoulder back no more than .001-inch. You'll probably get best accuracy this way as well as excellent case life."
 
Outdoorsman said:
Instead of neck sizing, and bump sizing, in two separate operations, with two different tools, why not full length size with a bushing type die each and every time we size? What does the competitive benchrest community know that we don't?

Actually I use a Forster Bushing Bump Die, that bumps the shoulder and sizes the neck in one operation. You can control the OD of the neck with the bushing size, as well as the amount of neck to be sized, and the amount of bump you want on the shoulder. It can be used with or without an expander ball. More info here:

http://www.forsterproducts.com/client_images/catalog19938/pages/files/Bushing_Bump_Neck_Sizing_Die_DIE-0008.pdf

The guys that FL size typically use a custom made die, and I did not want to go that route. It can work well too, if the die is well made.
 
Shynloco said:
Now perhaps because its a different caliber and I'm not using Lapua Brass or whatever, I'm only getting 4 reloads out of 22-250 using Winchester brass that I full length size each time and experience head separation after the four shootings. Go figure.

You may have excessive headspace. Worth checking. I've seen heads separate after 20 or so loadings but never after 4.
 
When fire forming any case that is larger at the shoulder and/or has a significantly sharper shoulder angle than the parent case, brass from the neck is pulled back into the shoulder as the shoulder expands during firing, shortening the overall length of the case. I just measured a .220 Russian case that has been expanded to 6mm prior to turning. It measured 1.506. Typically, after these cases are turned and fire formed, the longest trim length that I can use, that will clean up all the necks in a set, is 1.495. My chamber is supposed to be 1.515.

One more point...cases require more than one firing, with a stout load, to reach their maximum shoulder to head dimension. When someone sets his die FL die to produce the same shoulder to head dimension as once fired brass this means that there is some clearance.

As to what works best, do your own testing, the conditions of tests that you have not done may not be fully explained, and there are a lot of variables that can influence test results.

Also, never set dies by feel. Measure with tools that read to .001".
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,798
Messages
2,203,667
Members
79,130
Latest member
Jsawyer09
Back
Top