loneranger, I always think of Australia and Canada as being the closest in terms of lifestyle, language, and thinking among the population, as the USA. For that reason, I was shocked when I started to read about their laws. Many of the locals in Australia seem to say that it is not too big of a hardship, but I believe that is because it is normal to them now. They have already forgotten what true freedom is. I already know that I will catch flack for that last statement, but I in no way meant it as a derogatory statement, only an observation from afar. I started to include a blurb for the NRA, but shied away from it in my original post. After much thinking with the benefit of hindsight, I should have included a blurb. I actually thought that it would be obvious to anyone reading the post, my mistake. I know it is not reasonable, due to the extra work needed by the already over worked forum administrators, but I would not object to a requirement to be able to post to a thread or respond, that would include at minimum, verified NRA membership. I know that most are members here, but if the truth be know, I am certain that a few of the posting members do not hold a NRA membership. It will not catch on, as we have too many members that for whatever reason, falsely perceived or real, do not have the "backbone" to even include minimal information about themselves, so that they can remain "anonymous". They are showing their ignorance of the electronic age. As most know, computers have IP addresses, and cell phone usage is pretty visible, witness the NSA operations. I wish more people would become "visible" rather than trying to hide behind a pseudonym to build on their alter ego, as a Walter Mitty.
I personally would see nothing wrong with a minimal annual fee to cover the cost of the site and verifying NRA membership.
Kind of a "put your money where your mouth is".