Ha! Ha! Had the same thought. I had to google it!What does seven even mean?
Thats one of those neck sizing cause they do it in benchrest guys that is lookin for the fast “locktime”Ha! Ha! Had the same thought. I had to google it!
Firing pin material (alu shank) and spring weight (20lb) are suspect. I’m sure it’ll fire but it might not be not a great combo IMO.
I have several speed lock firing pins by David Tubb that have an alum shank. 1000's of rounds never had one give up yet. I wish he still made them for the M98.Ha! Ha! Had the same thought. I had to google it!
Firing pin material (alu shank) and spring weight (20lb) are suspect. I’m sure it’ll fire but it might not be not a great combo IMO.
I’ve never seen one give up either but that wasn’t my point.1000's of rounds never had one give up yet.
Ive never seen anybody use one long enough for it to give upI’ve never seen one give up either but that wasn’t my point.
Ha! Ha! Had the same thought. I had to google it!
Firing pin material (alu shank) and spring weight (20lb) are suspect. I’m sure it’ll fire but it might not be not a great combo IMO.
Light firing pins lack the mass to provide good ignitionWhat makes the combo not great?
Like Dusty said. I also said "might not be". Many make them work but it's been shown over and over consistent ignition might suffer from a combo such as that. It's like the old Timney short sear vs long sear years ago. Timney made triggers (510's) with a short sear to reduce or eliminate cock on close but that reduced pin fall by about .050" if I recall. Many had them work fine but many had failures to fire and or poor accuracy results. This was so bad with Surgeon actions that they made a long sear just for them. Word got out and those like myself wanted the long sear in the triggers to preserve the proper pin fall. Fast forward years later Timney abandoned that short sear no cock on close idea. For other design reasons I quit using Timney's anyway.What makes the combo not great?
Light firing pins lack the mass to provide good ignition
Like Dusty said. I also said "might not be". Many make them work but it's been shown over and over consistent ignition might suffer from a combo such as that. It's like the old Timney short sear vs long sear years ago. Timney made triggers (510's) with a short sear to reduce or eliminate cock on close but that reduced pin fall by about .050" if I recall. Many had them work fine but many had failures to fire and or poor accuracy results. This was so bad with Surgeon actions that they made a long sear just for them. Word got out and those like myself wanted the long sear in the triggers to preserve the proper pin fall. Fast forward years later Timney abandoned that short sear no cock on close idea. For other design reasons I quit using Timney's anyway.
I go for the mausingfield every time when it comes to reliable cyclingI’d be looking at a Bat, stiller, Mausingfield, or Kelbly atlas tactical.
Search around here for timing and ignition. You’ll never find a recommendation for a super light spring and pin.
The PRS nerds like them because they can cycle them fast…. But they also don’t clean their guns, so…
My kelbly atlas tac is probably the smoothest action I own and works every time! Not a huge fan of my stiller but nothing really wrong with itI’d be looking at a Bat, stiller, Mausingfield, or Kelbly atlas tactical.
Search around here for timing and ignition. You’ll never find a recommendation for a super light spring and pin.
The PRS nerds like them because they can cycle them fast…. But they also don’t clean their guns, so…
Give a mausingfield a test run. Nothing out there smoother and functions like a rolexMy kelbly atlas tac is probably the smoothest action I own and works every time! Not a huge fan of my stiller but nothing really wrong with it
Might not be a good thing.but you don’t hear much about them
I’ve shot and played with both the nuke and Archimedes but never the mausinffield.Give a mausingfield a test run. Nothing out there smoother and functions like a rolex
Not a clue but doesn’t seem to be winning any favours around here so definitely leaning more towards the lone peakI still havent found out why the name seven even.