F-class nationals match results

[Ranger188]

Anyone have an equipment list for F open?
Like to see if the 284 is still a favorite for them.

 

[ShootDots]

I don't have an equipment list. However, I ask LOTS of shooters what they are shooting. The .284 with all it's variations is still the most used cartridge(s). However, in the top twenty, there are a growing number of .300WSM shooters.

 

[Matthew Schwartzkopf]

Anyone have an equipment list for F open?
Like to see if the 284 is still a favorite for them.

We are gathering data and will be posting what we receive.

 

[4Bowhunter]

Wow! I see a couple of cleans in those scores too!
Phil Kolkman with 400-24 and Tim Vaught with 400-20!

Congrats All Around!

Thank you for saying. Couldn’t have Done it with out all those involved.
21st century shooting
Speedy
Jim Borden actions
Cerus rifle stocks
Nightforce scopes
Peterson Brass
And my hole team. What a great bunch of guys. Thank you to all.

 

[p scully]

Thank’s for all kind words guys. It’s an honor to shoot with this crowd.

 

[Medic505]

Congratulations to all the winners! Thank you to the Desert Sharpshooters for an outstanding match. Once again they made it look easy. So much fun meeting and shooting with new shooters and seeing those you consider family. Thanks again! I needed that!

 

[Rope2horns]

Anyone have an equipment list for F open?
Like to see if the 284 is still a favorite for them.

Tim Vaught repeated with another awesome mid-range championship and his 300wsm.....7 years in a row for that cartridge to dominate mid-range. Shehane was second.

For long range 1-Pat,2-Keith,3-Tod were straight 284's...Eric was Shehane, Timmy was 300wsm. Pat Fulghum 284, Ken Dickerman 300wsm....that's all i know for sure.

Congrats to Pat Scully for a hard fought win!!! Hard work pays off!!

Congrats to my awesome teammate Keith Glasscock for his 2nd Silver medal in as many years. That is super strong and nothing to hang your head about. WE ARE PROUD OF YOU!!!!

If anyone doesn't think x's matter, keep shooting less of them please.

 

[Ont0001]

Congratulations Pat and Ian! And to all attendees.
It sounds like it was an incredibly challenging event.
Look forward to seeing you back up here in Canada once
the crazy time ends.
Best Regards
Gord Ogg

 

[carlsbad]

Another comment about the conditions. There were about 80 shooters in the field who hold an NRA High Master Classification. There were a grand total of Zero HM scores (98.5% or 1576) in the final results.

If you look way down at the bottom in the EXpert results, you'll see the high Expert shot a score that would have gotten 12th High Master. But the score was just barely a Master score (97%-1552). (Some of you may recognize who that shooter is. ) So many High Masters were unable to shoot even a Master score in these conditions.

 

[praveen]

Another comment about the conditions. There were about 80 shooters in the field who hold an NRA High Master Classification. There were a grand total of Zero HM scores (98.5% or 1576) in the final results.

If you look way down at the bottom in the EXpert results, you'll see the high Expert shot a score that would have gotten 12th High Master. But the score was just barely a Master score (97%-1552). (Some of you may recognize who that shooter is. ) So many High Masters were unable to shoot even a Master score in these conditions.

For Long range, HM scores are above 98%. So there were indeed some HM scores shot.

 

[pat fulghum]

Anything at or above 1568 (98% of 1600) would be a HM score for grand aggregate, but several individual matches had many HM scores

For the grand agg...
Fopen - 4 shooters
FTR - no shooters

 

[Sandstorm]

Yes indeed.. well done Pat...and Ian. Bravo fellas.

 

[carlsbad]

For Long range, HM scores are above 98%. So there were indeed some HM scores shot.

Thanks. I kept getting conflicting answers on that and even tried to figure it out in the rules. So there were 4 HM scores shot. --Jerry

 

[Keith Glasscock]

I figure that 4 HM scores is a 100% improvement over 2019.

 

[carlsbad]

I figure that 4 HM scores is a 100% improvement over 2019.

Just to be clear, my comment was meant as a complement to the shooters. I have no idea how you and the 3 other did it. Humbling to me.

 

[D-4297]

First ; I would like to congratulate all of the winners , and those who placed in some of the most grueling conditions I have ever seen . This was my first F class Nationals , and I was extremely excited to have the opportunity to get to shoot with , and learn from , literally , the best in the world . If anyone out there thinks the comments regarding the conditions were over-stated , I can assure you , they were not . After the 1st relay of Mid-Range , on my Home Range , I felt embarrassed and nearly humiliated when I had to sign my card with one of the worst scores I had ever posted . As I began talking with other competitors , the realization came across , that I was but one of many that morning . And those who had the skill and knowledge to over-come , and avoid the train-wrecks deserve the accolades they are receiving . You really had to be here to grasp how brutal it really was .

 

[Down South]

Congrats to everyone who shot well and the winners of individuals and team matches. Glad to see you guys had a good match. Sounds like the conditions were challenging. Good shooting guys.

 

[Matthew Schwartzkopf]

I will be adding the links for the equipment list as I go at https://usfcnc.net/2020-f-class-nationals/2020-fcn-equipment-lists/. So far I have the Top Ten Shooters for the F-Open and F-TR Long-Range Nationals.

 

[Dub]

I will be adding the links for the equipment list as I go at https://usfcnc.net/2020-f-class-nationals/2020-fcn-equipment-lists/. So far I have the Top Ten Shooters for the F-Open and F-TR Long-Range Nationals.

thank you!

 

[Papa Charlie]

Does anyone know who won the rifle they were to raffle off?