chino69 said:
While I agree with everything you said, where do Dan Cooper's rights fit in?
Chino69
What rights of Mr. Cooper's were impinged upon?
Mr Cooper voiced his opinion and said what he wanted to say. In a nationally published interview no less. I do not get that kind of podium. Most folks don't, especially shooters.
The Illinois State Rifle Association is lucky to get any coverage. Even when several thousand of us show up to voice a position.
But then along comes a gun Manufacturer that supports Obama and his looney toon socialist platform and they slap him on the front page. A converted Republican no less!
Why do you suppose they did that?
So, after reading his position, his customer base who found the position un-palatable exercised their personal rights.
Their right to vote with their wallets. I.E. we're done buying or supporting those folks, especially those folks that make their living from us, that support politicians who stated goal is to impinge on our rights as shooters and gun owners. And the liberals will try to impinge them the first chance they get. Of that there can be no doubt.
So, His board board of directors looked at the consequence from that interview. Judged the reactions from the folks that pay their salaries, and did what they thought was best for the business.
That's the way this works.
There is
no right to immunity from the consequences of your actions or words.
There is
no right to a job no matter what you might say or do.
And most importantly of all.
There is
no right that says customers have to spend money at your business.
As I said before, it's best to not publicly irritate those that provides for your lively hood.