• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

CZ-527 review

So here's my new CZ-527 Varmint in .223rem with a 1:9" heavy 25" barrel. I topped it off with a Vortex Viper HS 4-16x44 and a Harris bipod. This will be my new 300 yard gopher, rabbit, and coyote gun.

DSCN0212.jpg


These rifles have not been without their own set of issues over the years. One of the first I heard about was that the barrels were not free floated. So after I received mine, this was one of the first things I checked. A piece of paper under the barrel and between the stock confirmed mine was indeed free floated. I'm glad CZ seems to have gotten their factory quality issues sorted out.

The second thing was many complaints about the "stickiness" of the bolt when cycling the action. Mine was indeed like this, but it was also bone dry out of the box. A quick search on YouTube and I found a few videos showing how to solve the problem. Some fine grit rubbing compound and crocus cloth and some light massaging in three different areas for about 5 minutes seems to have helped. Then a very small amount of G96 lube, and the action now cycles buttery smooth.

CZ also has a somewhat "proprietary" mount for rings. Finding a set proved more difficult than I expected. Also, earlier versions of this "mini-mauser" bolt handle proved tricky when mounting a scope. You had to have very high rings so the bolt knob would not conflict with your scope. Thankfully, CZ changed the bolt handle design and this problem is not as tricky now.

But as you can see, I seemed to have gotten the "geometry" just about perfect.

DSCN0206.jpg


BTW, those are Leupold rings. And I also got the scope nice and low over the barrel.

DSCN0208.jpg


So, I've been out twice with the new stick. I tested 5 different charge weights. With 26.3gr being the best of the bunch at 2970fps velocity and 3/4moa at 102 yards. I decided on the second trip to try a last weight of 26.6gr to see if I could squeeze out any better accuracy. It actually was just a bit better. The speed was 3012fps and it is a consistent 1/2moa now (when I do my part).

I found the lands with the Hornady OAL gauge. I decided to use a .010" jump and the accuracy of the rifle seems to agree, this is a good seating depth. Also this combination of bullet and seating depth works very well with magazine feeding. There's about .040" from the end of the bullet to the mag edge. Again, the "geometry" here is wonderful with room to spare.

DSCN0165.jpg


Load info:
Brass: Lapua
Bullet: Sierra 69gr SMK
Primer: CCI BR4
Powder: BLC-2 26.6gr 3012fps S.D.=9.2
COAL (ogive measurement): 1.885" with a .010" jump

I was also curious to see just how the 69gr SMK would perform beyond 300m. So I did some plinking out to 500m. It was a very calm Sunday...and it seemed I was having a hard time missing a 12" gong at that distance. (EDIT: it was a 6" gong, sorry.)

DSCN0213.jpg


I really like this rifle. The smaller stock fits me beautifully. And the wood is pretty to boot. The quality feel, fit and finish is pretty much CZ....excellent. And if you've never tried CZ's "set trigger", you're in for a pleasant surprise. By moving the trigger blade forward after you have it cocked, it gives a very light and crisp break. There is really no creep either when you've got it forward in the lighter setting. I would estimate that the pull is less than a pound.

Here's a picture of both trigger positions when cocked. Normal on the left and the set position on the right.

DSCN0218.jpg
DSCN0219.jpg



The heavier contour barrel did heat up with quicker shooting. Although with the 5 round magazine, I could let it cool down between mag reloads. The "mini-Mauser" action is a well proven design and there were no feed or extraction issues. The Vortex scope is as advertised... not top notch, but decent enough to 300m (which is just what I am looking for in this set-up).

Cleaning is a breeze. But the "latch" or "button" release to remove the bolt also needs to be pressed to get it back into the action. That's something I wasn't used to, and I had some pretty perplexing moments the first time I tried to put the bolt back. It also has a "European" style magazine release button. I takes a bit of getting used to since it is not at the rear of the mag, but on the right side. Some have complained about the look of the single stack magazine with this rifle. For me? ....meh. I don't mind one way or the other, just as long as there is a detachable mag to feed it with. Although the price of these mags are almost criminal.

I've owned a CZ-527 before. It was the shorter carbine in 7.62x39. It was pretty similar in performance except for accuracy (the x39 round is not really known for its accuracy). I find that the 25" barrel on this rifle is the ideal trade off between "compactness" and versatility. This is going to make a pretty decent bush gun. Recoil is really small being a .223, so follow-up shots are very easy to get on target.


So all in all, I would rate this around an 8.5 out of 10. For what my stated purpose is...an up to 300yd varmint gun, it fits the bill very well.

Richardson's beware!

DSCN0217.jpg



Andy 6MT

********************************************************************

I was rechecking my zero today when I shot this group (after the sighter). Pretty good for a factory rifle.

DSCN0230.jpg


I really like this rifle!!
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the review ...I own a older CZ in .221 fireball which I enjoy shooting. Also have a CZ75 SP-01 pistol
which is very accurate. I have not heard any one say they didn't like their CZ in any caliber.
 
I get frustrated with the feed from the magazine. Both rimmed and rimless cases. My 17 Remington feeds fine, the 204 tends to be a problem child. My 17HH has its moments, why I bought a 22 hornet is beyond me. The 22 hornet refuses to feed with any reliability at all. Slow and the cartridge stand straight up, or try to. To fast and it will miss the chamber and climb to the top of the action.
So maybe I have the one lemon or will be the first to complain about the CZ 527.
 
I've had four CZ 527's, two 17 Hornets, 17 Rem, 204, I still have the two 17 Hornets and the 204. The rimmed 17 Hornets certainly don't feed like the 204 but they are such fun little guns that I can live with their discomfort. I think the CZ 527's are a sweet shooting little gun off pretty high quality. Not to start any kind of brand war but I think the CZ 527's are a much higher quality and MUCH better shooting gun than are the Ruger 77/17 Hornets.
 
I have 4 CZ's. I like the older ones a bit better. I have a 527 in 222 that I have had for years.. I also have a 17 Hornet that I bought last year. There is a difference. The old one in 222 doesn't have a hard time re-seating a full magazine. The new one in 17 Hornet doesn't like to accept the full mag with a closed bolt. I have to slap it in.. Also I had to send mine back for feeding issues [17 Hornet] They claimed it was the wrong magazine. Still I had issues and then I studied the problem. Ended up turning the spring around. Better but once in a while I cuss it.. Still that 17 is deadly accurate.

As for the scope mount I now use a DIP rail, and Millet rings..
 
I have 4 CZ's. I like the older ones a bit better. I have a 527 in 222 that I have had for years.. I also have a 17 Hornet that I bought last year. There is a difference. The old one in 222 doesn't have a hard time re-seating a full magazine. The new one in 17 Hornet doesn't like to accept the full mag with a closed bolt. I have to slap it in.. Also I had to send mine back for feeding issues [17 Hornet] They claimed it was the wrong magazine. Still I had issues and then I studied the problem. Ended up turning the spring around. Better but once in a while I cuss it.. Still that 17 is deadly accurate.

As for the scope mount I now use a DIP rail, and Millet rings..
 
MY hornet feeds perfectly, have one in the hornet and a .223 both are GREAT. I also have an old Walther in hornet and the CZ shoots better. Haven't shot the Walther in years. It is nice and probably smoother but the CZ just does better overall. I guess they would be the older version because I've had both for over 20 yrs and bought the .223 used. The hornet was in a very ratty box and presumed new but it had already been around a while. Bought both from the same guy before we kind of found out they were pretty good guns, (at least around here.) I gave less for the new hornet than I did the .223. At the time we kind of looked at them with some disdain. I really didn't know what I was buying when I bought the hornet but at the price I brought it home. Very happy with it. Black bird killer extreme! Killed a few late night possums too. The .223 has taken 3 cyotes 2 of them right up here in my yard.
 
CZ 527 in .223.... yep the one my father inlaw had was awesome. If I had the money I would have bought it.
frown.gif

Only issue I know of was the magazine or magazine release came apart once. Easy fix though.
Would shoot moa pretty easily with just about any ammo he put into it.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,381
Messages
2,194,288
Members
78,863
Latest member
patrickchavez
Back
Top