• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Cold temp primers

Chris Butler

Gold $$ Contributor
Is there any conclusive evidence for using magnum primers in a small bore non-magnum cartridge in cold temps, i.e. single digits? Specifically .223 Rem bolt gun
 
Not from me. Maybe I'm one of the few (I don't know) but primers over ALL these years (seating etc.) I'd say have been the least of my problems by far. And I have shot in some horribly cold places.
 
You should stick with the primers that you load developed with. For colder temps intended you might plan on developing with thinner primers (Feds, Wins). This, because striking often slows with dropping temps and thicker primer cups (like with CCIs) become susceptible to misfiring first.
PrimerDim.jpg
 
I thought the 223 required the thicker cups to keep from blanking them. I remember reading where guys used Remington 7 1/2 and CCI BR4 because of pressure. Matt
 
I don't think that one primer brand is categorically going to be better than another in lower relative temperatures - the largest and most significant variable will always be the powder; with all the tests done rating "heat of brisance" and related pressure and velocity results, I've never seen any evidence that inconsistent results in velocity or accuracy at lower temps could be traced to differing primer 'performance'. Most primers generate flash temp of 900 degrees F give or take, so changes in relative air temps - of say 40 degrees - is not going to change primer function. Having said that, Winchester Large Rifle primers tend to generate larger 'flash' particles that penetrate deeper into larger powder charges than other brand/types, so if you want to ensure the most complete powder ignition under any conditions that would be my choice. How accurate (consistent) the WLR primer would be with your powder/bullet combination is a whole different story. All that IMHO :)

The main difference in regular rifle primers and magnum rifle primers is not in the heat or duration of flash but in the construction of the primer body. Magnum primers are built of heavier (thicker) walls to help withstand deformation of the primer cup from the higher pressures generated within the cartridge case during ignition. That being the case, Winchester larger and magnum primers appear to be constructed identically, and once when I compared chronographed Win 270 velocities between the two with identical components using I-4350, I could not see discernable differences nor was one more accurate than the other. So I stick to my belief if my pet load at 70 degrees goes s--t at 30 degrees, it ain't the primer that's the issue. YMMV :)
 
Last edited:
Have to disagree with p-man. Decades ago, I saw some photos when they were testing regular and magnum primers. The magnum primers DEFINITELY had a much brighter/hotter flash.
 
And I must defer to you on that - I have no idea what it's like to shoot at those temperatures. If you've tried all the major manufacturers' primers, is it your experience that all magnum primers shoot more consistently than regular large rifle primers?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,906
Messages
2,225,106
Members
80,023
Latest member
dbandrews79
Back
Top