I got to thinking about the test I did with the SS rods and Iosso - maybe the reduction in diameter was just from smoothing out the surface and, if the test continued, the rate of reduction would go way down.
So, I just redid the test on a fresh SS rod. As before, I spun the 1/8" SS rod in a cloth with Iosso for 20 seconds; each time I used a fresh cloth and fresh Iosso.
After each pass of 20 seconds, I measured the diameter of the SS rod where the Iosso contacted it with a Mitutoyo mic. I took measurements at 6 random locations around the diameter.
Here's the results:
[td]
0
[/td][td]
1
[/td][td]
2
[/td][td]
3
[/td][td]
4
[/td][td]
5
[/td]
[td]
0.11735
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td][td]
0.11720
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11715
[/td]
[td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11720
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td]
[td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11735
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td]
[td]
0.11735
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td][td]
0.11720
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td]
[td]
0.11740
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td][td]
0.11735
[/td][td]
0.11720
[/td][td]
0.11720
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td]
[td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11730
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td]
[td]
0.11733
[/td][td]
0.11728
[/td][td]
0.11728
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td][td]
0.11726
[/td][td]
0.11725
[/td]
I guess first is should we be comfortable that these results are meaningful? In reading others' comments about measuring below tenths, I wonder if the fifth decimal has any meaning? Are we comfortable with the measurements to the tenth's?
Assuming the tenth's are valid, it looks like the first pass smooths out/polishes the surface. After that, it looks like there is no further material removed.
What do you think?
To me this looks like the first pass with the Iosso polishes rough spots