Well, my choice of a 14.5" bbl was a deliberate choice as this is intended for mobility, knowing extreme accuracy could well suffer. Loading for accuracy includes annealing, volume testing, case sorting, etc etc and I'm not doing any of that for this gun. Pretty much no one anywhere chooses a 14./5" bbl for LR accuracy.
But like I said... I took JP to be saying "It may / may not stabilize.... U gotta try it" which I find 100% credible / in agreement with my 20+ years of shooting / reloading / reading / research. Translation as to what the tech meant: "there a 5% chance it won't stabilize. I'm gonna mention that to this stranger who called in so if it doesn't, I can remind him I told him that was a possibility."
Like you said.... JP makes good stuff. In reality, they make some of the very best AR's in the world. I find it rather unseemly ppl here are dogging them. e.g. "they are just techs, etc" THOSE TECHS are the ones actually building the rifles.
Bottom line? For this first round of testing the 69s, they stabilized in my 14.5 and in the some 40 separate 5-round test groups, the 77's did NOT. (JP was kinda proven right, and those disagreeing with them proven wrong.) Far as my gun... that's the end of the discussion. (I'm not here to make claims about what I think should happen in everyone's 14.5" AR ) For me / my gun, what actually happenned by far outweighs whatever anyone thinks SHOULD happen. The real world always trumps the theoretical. And any disagreement with / arguing against that is foolish.