sparker said:
Mind every reader that I am not taking pot shots at Robert's action. The design has some amazing features. The one aspect of the design that still has me perplexed is the issue of bolt compression under load.
Scott Parker
Bakersfield CA
*
Scott,
I took that as a friendly conversatjon, no problem. Just the king of conversation I enjoy
Without going into full calculation, which I think was already made for our long exchanges at the time, compression is expressed in kilogrammes per square millimetre or pounds per square inch.
Section, length of the section and mechanical properties of the material play their role.
To simplify, resistance under compression is usually considered as being 75% of the
Rm.
On the INCH, the bolt is a plain tube (the ideal section) of a steel treated at 180 kgs/sq mm.
The smallest crossection is 270 sq/mm over a 22mm length to the lugs. Ahead it is
310sq/mm and increase in steps forward. The only section then to consider is the smallest and only over a length of 22mm.
Therefore : 270 x 180 x 0,75 = 36,45 metric tons compression resistance.
A Magnum case at 4450 bar (max CIP pressure) has a rear internal surface of 1,15 square centimetree, therefore, backthrust is : 4450x1,15 = 5120 bar, say 5,2 metric tonnes.
Forgive me if I use measures I am better used to!!
With the SMLE for instance, the problem is not only the thin tube, but also with buckling of a thin not surrounded bolt, a situation not to consider for a stiff match single shot action who surrounder the bolt almost completely.
Friendly
Robert