Re: Case fillers: Fact or Fiction? and a BIGEDP51D dumb statment
“In simple terms fguffey you CAN NOT make a short case longer until it is fired in a rifles chamberâ€
Ed, as I have said before, I feel sorry for you, again, I hear you hollering for help, please understand those that I have tried to help were no better off after I finished than when I started, most found out, too late, I run like a tree.
“In simple terms fguffey you CAN NOT make a short case longer until it is fired in a rifles chamberâ€
I need to know where you live, I believe I can help you with the difference between fire forming and forming, fire forming is about immediate gratification, chamber a round, pull the trigger and ‘Wha-Lah’ self promotion from chambering a round to fire forming by pulling the trigger. If you were not so obsessed with your name and Google you could avoid these embarrassing moments, well I gave you more credit than you deserve, nothing embarrasses you because, in ,my opinion, you can not be insulted, but on the outside chance someone is reading this and makes the mistake of take you serious I will clarify your statement: “fguffey you CAN NOT make a short case longer until it is fired in a rifles chamberâ€, when fire forming a case in a rifle chamber the case gets shorter, not longer, Hatcher knew his modified chamber with .080 thousands would lead to case head separation, he knew the case would not stretch that much with out separating, truth, he knew it would happen sooner, meaning he progressively moved the shoulder forward, Hatcher, like you did not have a clue, had he measured before and again after firing he would have know his cases were getting shorter, not longer, had the cases gotten longer when he attempted firing, his cases would have come apart as in case head separation, then there was the other mistake, I explained to you Hatcher experiment failed, again, Hatcher was correct in his assumption, then I told you about a couple of smiths built a magnificent wildcat 7mm like Gibbs, they made the reamer etc., the first 10 cases they attempted to fire form had case head separation, they used the same type receiver as Hatcher (5 of them) Hatcher did not have case head separation, my two friends did, One of them explained the problem and went straight to selling me I was wrong, and I informed him the next time happens, call me, I can tell you before you leave the shop if you are in you are going to have case head separation, or I could meet him at the range and fix the problem long enough to fire form his cases, again, remember, if he measures the case length before firing he will discover the cases got shorten when fired.
This goes back to the 16 pages of insults and venom you laced your responses with, I felt sorry for Bozo699 Wayne and others, insults and innuendos, I could not believe the monitors allowed that kind of behavior, the forum deserved better, but when forming cases with lube the case does not necessary get shorter, the case does not lock onto the chamber, the lube allows the case to slide to the rear and fill the chamber from the rear, this eliminates the risk of case head separation, (typing slower) You do not have a clue, me? on the other hand, I am not concerned with with the length of the case as to your remark “making the case longer†I am talking about making the case longer from the head of the case to the shoulder of the case, bench rest shooters are not talking about making the case longer, they are talking about making the case body longer from the head of the case to the shoulder of the case, the case gets shorter when the case fills the chamber, as to The High Forum, Clark, a descendent of Clark the gunsmith that built 45ACP said he had separation because he had excessive head space, by .004 thousandths, and I said everyone on this forum believe you but me. No mention of the receiver and no one noticed his case separated behind the case body shoulder juncture, not at the case head, meaning when his case expanded and filled the chamber neck was locked into the neck of the chamber, meaning when the case fills the chamber the case body and neck is pulled back, (did I just repeat myself), Clarks case separated behind the shoulder, meaning the case body did not lock onto the chamber, I believe Clark has acquired some bad habits, I suspect he lubed the case body, the lube prevented the case from locking onto the chamber, I believe the neck and shoulder of the case was pulled off, meaning the neck and a very small part of the case body locked onto the chamber, and he said it happened every time he attempted to fire form cases in that chamber, and I suggested forming first would eliminate the problem.
“In simple terms fguffey you CAN NOT make a short case longer until it is fired in a rifles chamberâ€
There are not many bench resters, smith, reloaders understand how dumb your statement is, Cylinder brass is 2.650 long from the case head to the mouth of the case, for me that is a can not fail to fit any chamber that used the 30/06 as a parent case, I form 338/06 cases from 30/06 cases without changing the length of the case from the case head to the shoulder of the case, neck? that is different, the necks shorten .035 thousandths. Same for 35 Whelen, but I am a case former, when I want the case to cover all the chamber I use 280 Remington cases, the 280 Remington case is longer than the 30/06 by .041 thousandths, AND! the shoulder of the 280 R is ahead of the 30/06 shoulder .051 thousandths, for those that can keep up, when forming cases it is not necessary to start with a short, unless you are the author of this dumb statement “In simple terms fguffey you CAN NOT make a short case longer until it is fired in a rifles chamber†and at the risk of repeating myself, fire formers know the case gets shorter, not longer Unless, I repeat, unless a bench rester is lubing his cases, and that separates me from bench resters and fire formers, I form first then fire, I am, the fan of cutting down on all that case travel.
F. Guffey