I have mixed feelings about blems and seconds. I bought a bunch of Nosler RDF 6mm blems and or seconds, can’t remember which. Figured, hey, this is a hybrid wannabe, with a good BC, they’ll shoot inside my Dasher with Berger’s 108’s (which I love), and they’re cheap too.
So, I wrung them out at 100 and 300, and a LR practice, not too bad, an occasional flyer, hey, that could be me, not the bullets. Took them to a LR match, after the first day, I wished for my Berger 108’s back. With great conditions, X after X, then a wide 8, almost a 7, back to 10’s and X’s, then another 8. Conditions were so good, everyone was scoring. I have to take the squeaker 9’s over then line, but a 7 or 8, with no consistency, something was wrong. The second day was they same, solidly in the lower middle of the pack with unexplained flyers.
Returned to my Berger 108’s on the next match and won the F-Open, 2nd overall to a great FTR shooter that set the match on fire, good for him, (my buddy).
The moral of this story is, we spend $2500 plus on a rifle, $1500 on a scope, not counting the accouterments that we pay for, travel time, motel, meals, barrel life depreciation, etc, etc. and we look to save $.10 a shot on using lower quality bullets, doesn’t make sense IMO. I can’t even justify using seconds for practice, why would I use a bullet that I have no confidence in going to the point of aim?
If you shooting clay birds on a berm, varmints or tin cans, use whatever, but if your spending all the time and money to compete, shoot the best you can afford. I haven’t tried real custom bullets (Bart’s etc.), but Berger’s have been consistent. Lots have been so good, that I set my seating depth and I’m good to go. On a side note, I shot Sierra 107’s on a match, where I segregated the bullets by LTO, and placed high in the standings. But, it took a lot of time to handle every bullet, I haven’t had to do that with Berger’s so far.