• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

California Shooters - What Will You Do if Newsom Measure Passes?

By now, every California shooter should have heard of Gavin Newsom's Safety For All Act of 2016 ballot initiative. If this passes, and passes any court challenges, then what will you do in order to secure ammo? Since most here reload, and CA's definition on what ammo actually is, is somewhat unclear, but does include components such as case and projectile, this measure could affect reloaders. I have posted this on a California specific forum, but am posting here to understand what we will do with reloading.

The proposal says in part the following.

Commencing January 1, 2018, a resident of this state shall not bring or transport into this state any ammunition that he or she purchased or otherwise obtained on or after January 1, 2018, from outside of this state unless he or she first has that ammunition delivered to a licensed ammunition vendor in this state for delivery to that resident pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 30312.

AND

The sale, delivery or transfer of ownership of ammunition by any party may only occur in a face-to-face transaction with the seller, deliverer or transferor being provided bona fide evidence of identity from the purchaser or transferee, provided, however, that commencing January 1, 2018, ammunition may be purchased or acquired over the Internet or through other means of remote ordering if a licensed ammunition vendor in this state initially receives the ammunition and processes the transaction in compliance with this section

If you buy, in the aforementioned face-to-face transaction, you have to do this.

Commencing July 1, 2019, an ammunition vendor shall not sell or otherwise transfer ownership of any ammunition without, at the time of delivery, legibly recording the following information on a form to be prescribed by the Department of Justice:
(1) The date of the sale or other transfer.
(2) The purchaser's or transferee's driver's license or other identification number and the state in which it was issued.
(3) The brand, type, and amount of ammunition sold or otherwise transferred. (4) The purchaser's or transferee's full name and signature.
(5) The name of the salesperson who processed the sale or other transaction. (6) The purchaser's or transferee's full residential address and telephone number.
(6) The purchaser's or transferee's date of birth.


And you need a $50 2 year permit...

The Department may charge a reasonable fee not to exceed $50 per person for the issuance of an ammunition purchase authorization or the issuance of a renewal authorization...

The Department may charge a reasonable fee not to exceed $50 per person for the issuance of an ammunition purchase authorization or the issuance of a renewal authorization...

And what is "ammunition"?

As used in this part, except in subdivision (a) of Section 30305 and in Section 30306, "ammunition" means one or more loaded cartridges consisting of a primed case, propellant, and with one or more projectiles. "Ammunition" does not include blanks. 12 (b) As used in subdivision (a) of Section 30305 and in Section 30306, "ammunition" includes, but is not limited to, any bullet, cartridge, magazine, clip, speed loader, autoloader, or projectile capable of being fired from a firearm with a deadly consequence. ''Ammunition" does not include blanks.

----------------------------------------------

I expect this initiative will make into law and may even withstand court challenges. So, assuming that is the case, how will you respond?

I plan to shoot 6mmBR and reload. You think the local gun store will be stocking Lapua 6mmBR brass? Not around my parts. How I am supposed to reload then? Mail order and have it shipped to a CA FFL? If they are even willing to do this, how much will that cost? Maybe special order it for me? Again, at what cost, especially with all the extra paperwork and effort ammo dealers have to go through (much more than now). I expect many mail order firms to drop CA for anything ammo related. If I can't mail order and I can't get locally, then what? The idiot Newsom appears to think ammo is all the same.

Phil
 
Having lived in CA for 50 years and recently moved to Oregon all I can say is 'I feel your pain'. My brother in San Francisco shoots BPC matches as well as loads 30-06 and a few pistol calibers. No idea how he will fare under that kind of nonsense either. Hopefully California Rifle and Pistol can garner more members and lobby the hell out the legislature.
 
"As used in this part, except in subdivision (a) of Section 30305 and in Section 30306, "ammunition" means one or more loaded cartridges consisting of a primed case, propellant, and with one or more projectiles. "Ammunition" does not include blanks. 12 (b) As used in subdivision (a) of Section 30305 and in Section 30306, "ammunition" includes, but is not limited to, any bullet, cartridge, magazine, clip, speed loader, autoloader, or projectile capable of being fired from a firearm with a deadly consequence. ''Ammunition" does not include blanks."

I do not see how any justice can not in good conscious strike it down as being too vague. As it reads above, some of the items that would be outlawed include, rock salt, marbles, ball bearings, gravel, coins, nails, nuts and bolts, etc.
 
Additionally, some enterprising individual in another state will be loading new brass with powder, a paper wad and wax. Now that brass is legal to bring into the state.
 
Phil3 said:
And you need a $50 2 year permit...

If they are even willing to do this, how much will that cost?

Again, at what cost, especially with all the extra paperwork and effort ammo dealers have to go through (much more than now).

That's all part of the plan.

If they can't ban it outright, just make it so prohibitively expense that nobody can afford it anyway.
 
"ammunition" includes, but is not limited to, any .... projectile capable of being fired from a firearm with a deadly consequence.

Jim Casey said:
Additionally, some enterprising individual in another state will be loading new brass with powder, a paper wad and wax. Now that brass is legal to bring into the state.

Following the definition above, the proposed cartridge with wadding and wax would also be illegal.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon-Erik_Hexum ...

"Apparently, he had unloaded all but one (blank) round, spun it, and in what would appear to be a game of Russian roulette, at 5:15 p.m., he put the revolver to his right temple and pulled the trigger.

Hexum was apparently unaware that his actions were dangerous. Blanks use paper or plastic wadding to seal gunpowder into the cartridge, and this wadding is propelled from the barrel of the gun with enough force to cause injury if the weapon is fired within a few feet of the body should it strike at a particularly vulnerable spot, such as the temple or the eye. At a close enough range, the effect of the powder gasses is similar to a small explosion so although the paper wadding in the blank that Hexum discharged did not penetrate his skull, there was enough blunt force trauma to shatter a quarter-sized piece of his skull and propel the pieces into his brain, causing massive hemorrhaging."
 
Lived in California for about 26 years. I am not surprised about anything that can or has happened there. Those people are just not right in the head. I still think there should be two states, North and South. The north can sell water to the south if they want to then...nuff on that one. But as for this law/proposal....anything can happen. I'm a firm believer in voting with my wallet. I'd get up on I80 or I10 and head East until I saw a sign that said shooters welcome.
 
raythemanroe said:
How many of you californian's would still vote for Democrats?



Ray

Still an overwhelming majority if youd like to bet. Voting is cool- knowing what youre voting for is unneccesary
 
Thay old saying "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig" applies here. This is still infringement! Mike
 
Uthink Uknow said:
One can still visit a mosque, turn Muslim, and get all the ammo one needs, right?
There you have it.

ABDUL'S MOSQUE AND AMMO DEPOT.

Islam Bob can walk into a hardware store and ask for short pipe and caps without a redflag popping up in the great state of Califorkinia but if he uses a already illegal high capacity mag we need stronger gun control.. "Gun control" not terrorist control, we import those as refugees, no permit needed or background check..



Ray
 
In New York we are currently not allowed to have ammunition shipped to us from out of the state or even in the state. I wanted some Lapua Factory ammo to fire in three new builds I have received so that I can send fired cases to Whidden for custom dies. I finally found who had the ammo in stock, had Bob White at The Shooters Corner, order it for me and drove 47 miles each way to get it from Bob. Fortunately New Jersey still allows sales of ammo to out of state residents. There are a few dealers in New York that will accept shipments of ammo and transfer it to users for a fee. We have to do this for our mass buys of Shotgun Shells. When you add short supply to both existing and expected any gun / ammo purchases, it is no wonder there is Hording going on. I have about 20 big store / shops on my list that when traveling around, I always stop into and pick up what I can.

Bob
 
Links to eight of what they portray as “Gun Facts”, only some of the sort of illogic we’re up against:
http://gunvictimsaction.org/counterintuitive-gun-facts/

[Their] Gun Fact #2 If Only the Criminals Had Guns, U.S. Gun Homicides Would Plummet
http://gunvictimsaction.org/counterintuitive-gun-facts/gun-fact-2-if-only-the-criminals-had-guns-u-s-gun-homicides-would-plummet/

snipit from an unbelievably idiotic “Fact” #2:

“It is the law-abiding citizens with guns, not the criminals, who are committing the majority of the gun homicides. Each of the recent high-profile gun massacres (Virginia Tech, Ft. Hood, Tucson, Aurora, Oikos University and the Sikh Mosque) was committed [by] a law abiding citizen—not one was from the hand of a criminal.”


... ... ...

VOTE !
 
I have noticed that not one of these "MASS SHOOTINGS" has yet been stopped by a concealed or open carry citizen. The answer is obviously we need many many more concealed carry and open carry citizens around....wouldn't you say??
 
Uthink Uknow said:
One can still visit a mosque, turn Muslim, and get all the ammo one needs, right?
There you have it.

ABDUL'S MOSQUE AND AMMO DEPOT.

Our Constitution guarantees religious freedom, the same as it guarantees the right to own firearms. Anyone against the Constitution needs to find another place to live. We should not pick and choose which parts of the Constitution we abide by, unless you wish to sound like a Democrat.
 
Jim Casey said:
Uthink Uknow said:
One can still visit a mosque, turn Muslim, and get all the ammo one needs, right?
There you have it.

ABDUL'S MOSQUE AND AMMO DEPOT.

Our Constitution guarantees religious freedom, the same as it guarantees the right to own firearms. Anyone against the Constitution needs to find another place to live. We should not pick and choose which parts of the Constitution we abide by, unless you wish to sound like a Democrat.

Sorry, but open boarders and importing Syrian terrorists has nothing to do with the constitution.. Mosques are not above the law or untouchable just because we have a Muslim and Chief..Don't import terrorists while "attempting" to disarm us..


Ray
 
raythemanroe said:
Jim Casey said:
Uthink Uknow said:
One can still visit a mosque, turn Muslim, and get all the ammo one needs, right?
There you have it.

ABDUL'S MOSQUE AND AMMO DEPOT.

Our Constitution guarantees religious freedom, the same as it guarantees the right to own firearms. Anyone against the Constitution needs to find another place to live. We should not pick and choose which parts of the Constitution we abide by, unless you wish to sound like a Democrat.

Sorry, but open boarders and importing Syrian terrorists has nothing to do with the constitution.. Mosques are not above the law or untouchable just because we have a Muslim and Chief..Don't import terrorists while "attempting" to disarm us..


Ray

Ray,
You used a quotation of my post, so it is assumed that it is a response to that post. You never mention what I spoke of, but drift off into your own personal rant. That is the same tactic that Hillary, Obama, etal Democrats use to back up their arguments, zero facts in response to what was said.
Jim
 
Mosques are not above the law !! Gaining intelligence of importing ISIS brides and orchestrating mass shootings seems to be stopped at the door of Mosques, Is that in the constitution or is it okay to assume it is just the policy of this administration? Can one take consideration to the blind eye to Islam by this administration without perverting the constitution? Walking into Mosques maybe constitutional so is our freedom to be ignorant..

Ray
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,311
Messages
2,216,161
Members
79,543
Latest member
drzaous
Back
Top