• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Bushing / Neck Tension issue.

64Rambler

Gold $$ Contributor
I started playing with neck tension recently for my 6BRA. I started with a Wilson 266 bushing and it gives me ~0.003" interference from loaded, and the sized neck comes in at 0.2660-0.2665" with calipers, loaded round is 0.2690-0.2695" (yes, I know I should be using a micrometer and Christmas is coming, so that will solve that issue...). Then I ordered a Wilson 267 and found a good deal on a Redding TiN 265. The 267 gives me 0.2670-0.2675", but the TiN 265 is giving me 0.2630-2635". I had heard that the Redding TiN bushing sized a bit large, but I found the exact opposite. I ran gauge pins in all of them and they're right where they should be, within 0.0002". So I ordered a Wilson 265 bushing and got the exact same result; 0.2630-0.2635". And it feels like that much more interference when seating a bullet. This seems like the opposite of spring back. This is with both Alpha and Lapua brass, flame annealed. What am I seeing/missing here?
 
I started playing with neck tension recently for my 6BRA. I started with a Wilson 266 bushing and it gives me ~0.003" interference from loaded, and the sized neck comes in at 0.2660-0.2665" with calipers, loaded round is 0.2690-0.2695" (yes, I know I should be using a micrometer and Christmas is coming, so that will solve that issue...). Then I ordered a Wilson 267 and found a good deal on a Redding TiN 265. The 267 gives me 0.2670-0.2675", but the TiN 265 is giving me 0.2630-2635". I had heard that the Redding TiN bushing sized a bit large, but I found the exact opposite. I ran gauge pins in all of them and they're right where they should be, within 0.0002". So I ordered a Wilson 265 bushing and got the exact same result; 0.2630-0.2635". And it feels like that much more interference when seating a bullet. This seems like the opposite of spring back. This is with both Alpha and Lapua brass, flame annealed. What am I seeing/missing here?
Wilson bushing are tapered, I like them that way because I can flip them over for a tiny extra squeeze, but regardless. I don’t get axle wrapped over trying to measure the bushing ID or mess with mandrels, just size a case and compare the neck OD to a loaded round at the CASE MOUTH and go shoot a bushing ladder at distance.
For a .269 loaded round, I would test a .266-.265-.264.

One will stand out’ then test a smaller one.
 
Last edited:
  • Unlike some other brands (like Redding, which are generally straight), Wilson bushings are designed with a slight internal taper (around 3 degrees).
Redding recommends against sizing down more than approximately 0.008" in a single step. Attempting to size down more in one pass can lead to problems such as excessive case neck runout (poor concentricity) and can cause the actual sized diameter to be smaller than the bushing's marked size due to increased brass springback and stress.
 
sizing down more than approximately 0.008" in a single step
That certainly isn't the intent, but seems to be the outcome. I'm running a 272 chamber and fired brass matches that well. The 265 bushings (straight or tapered) are giving me 2 thou more than design, pushing actual step down to 0.0085"
So I'll try 267, reanneal, then 265 and see what I get.
 
  • Unlike some other brands (like Redding, which are generally straight), Wilson bushings are designed with a slight internal taper (around 3 degrees).
Redding recommends against sizing down more than approximately 0.008" in a single step. Attempting to size down more in one pass can lead to problems such as excessive case neck runout (poor concentricity) and can cause the actual sized diameter to be smaller than the bushing's marked size due to increased brass springback and stress.
I thought the threshold was sizing down by more than 0.004" in one step.
 
My method with fired brass:
1)Clean
2)Burn-(anneal)
3)FL Size-.002” under desired inside neck dim. (Imperial Sizing Die Wax)
4)Trim/Chamfer/Deburr...if needed
5)Graphite inside neck (Imperial Dry Neck Lube & Media)
6)Wipe off outside of case body/neck
7)Mandrel to desired neck dim.
 
Are you properly annealing your cases? With flame annealing it can be tricky to heat consistently to the proper temperature. Use temperature paint or an IR temperature gun. My guess is the cases aren’t reaching a high enough temperature to relieve stress. You will see more consistent neck sizing, shoulder bump and neck tension if you anneal properly

You don’t say if you’re neck turning. That will also play a role in consistent neck tension.

Dave.
 
I had to order 2 new bushings yesterday (smaller sizes) to accommodate my 30x47. I ordered SAC standard bushings, $40 apiece plus shipping, almost $100 for 2. Can't tell me there is no inflation, bushings used to be 14-17 $ apiece. Maybe not the SAC's, but in order to get the sizes I wanted they were the only ones with them in stock.
I guess I might have to buy an annealer.
 
Are you properly annealing your cases? With flame annealing it can be tricky to heat consistently to the proper temperature. Use temperature paint or an IR temperature gun. My guess is the cases aren’t reaching a high enough temperature to relieve stress. You will see more consistent neck sizing, shoulder bump and neck tension if you anneal properly

You don’t say if you’re neck turning. That will also play a role in consistent neck tension.

Dave.
No turn on necks yet, though I do have a set of 10 pieces that I cleaned up a bit, removing just enough to touch 80-90% of the diameter, but they don't shoot any better than the unturned brass. I have 0.003" clearance on a loaded round, versus the print neck diameter.
I heat 1 sec past 700F Tempilaq melt. There seems to be a lot of discrepancy for the proper annealing temp. I've seen everything from 650F to 1100F and from "you have to get to a dull red glow to be properly annealed" to "a dull red glow will ruin your brass". I've been adding a bit more time in the flame to see what the effect is on target.
 
I think that if all necks have the same ID, you might just be a happy camper. Not so dependent on neck wall thickness. Whatta Hobby!
If you have 2 cases with the exact same ID, and the neck walls are different, say, .010 to .013.
Which case will yield more neck tension / grip on the bullet? Neck tension will be influenced by thickness of the brass. Perhaps even trim length as a longer surface area of bullet grip will apply more pressure.
On this same note...a full length non bushing die will typically add another .100 of surface grip to the bearing surface over a bushing die. Seems to be a lot more than just inside diameter to me.
 
So nice to have choices. I am one of those goofballs that anneals after every firing and yes Lapua brass gets the treatment. Until I started that process, I was never able to keep my SD down to mid single digits. If it works for you, enjoy. That's what it's all about. Whatta Hobby!

223 annealing.jpg223 annealing 1.jpg
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,459
Messages
2,233,196
Members
80,472
Latest member
Bwag
Back
Top