Great info! Just read some stuff at Berger’s site that barrel length is a factor due to more heat just like you posted. Thanks again.Berger did a study several years ago on the causes of bullets 'poofing'.
As I remember, the key was heat transferred to the lead core followed by RPM of the bullet. Enough heat and the lead core gets soft/melts.
Heat was transferred to the lead core from heat generated by friction with the bore. The thinner the jacket, the faster heat was transferred. Enough RPM's and the softened lead core comes out through the jacket.
Contributing factors were condition of the throat and the tightness of the bore. A ragged throat removes copper from the jacket - essentially thinning it. A tighter bore increases heat from friction.
Alot of people don't take this into consideration when picking a barrel twist, its why I dont believe in spinning a bullet any faster than necessary.Contributing factors were condition of the throat
Had great accuracy and performance with the 50 sx in a788 in 222. Thought they'd be great out of a 220 swift. Ummm, not so much!! They left what looked like pepper size holes in the target. Wondered what was going on, couldn't see bullet holes in the target through the spotting scope. LolPerhaps you meant to include twist rate when you mention speed, but the faster the twist rate the more likely bullet destruction (assuming same velocity) with certain thin jacketed bullets. One that comes to mind in my experience is 50-grain Hornady .224" SX bullets working fine in 1-12" twist at 3,400 fps, but turning into puffs of smoke when fired from a 1-8" barrel.