DngBat7
Silver $$ Contributor
I actually think we did get the idea in 1944 from the flying wing we took from Germany.Your bullet seating process should be held to the same standard as your case sizing, base to datum (aka headspace), since that is what the chamber references from. Additionally, your sizing die should have the exact same angle in the shoulder as your chamber. If not, you're likely just chasing your tail.
So if you mistakenly bump back the shoulder an extra .002, and you're seating into the lands, your bullet is going to end up .002 deeper into the lands. And vice versa if you don't bump back far enough. And is seems to me that if the die is changing the angle of the shoulder, you'll get an inconsistent placement in the lands when the firing pin hits and drives the case tight against the shoulder, cold forming it to conform to the chamber.
But I'm no expert, so others may beg to differ. YMMV.
BTW: X-47B....incredible advancement in flying technology. Too bad it took the Gov't 40 years to figure that out. Or maybe they were just making sure to not leap way ahead in technology in order to keep the Cold War going longer. Imagine if we had a stealth bomber in 1949. Hmmmm...boggles the mind.