Don't apologize, you were the only person to adequately explain how the process works, I was doing everything ass backwards until you provided a detailed explanation of the process. I've decided after going through this obnoxious process that I'm not going to try to save $4-$5 dollars to get to the result I'm seeking. In short, the compromised brass is going to get thrown out and I'm going to return the RCBS dies and spend the extra $25.00 for the Redding dies. RCBS may be 1st in service, they do whatever it takes to make a customer happy; I'd rather spend the extra $$$, get the Redding Dies and not have to rely on service to work out the problems. Reloading for me is a hobby, a pastime that I want to enjoy. I don't reload to save $$$. I reload because I enjoy the exercise and strive to develop loads that are far superior to what I can buy off the shelf. I'm not going to spend afternoons reloading where it's an exercise in frustration. I want to enjoy what I'm doing. Even if I spend twice the money buying the best reloading equipment because at the end of the day, I'll still be saving money as opposed to buying custom ammunition.Wow, that is far below national average.![]()
Normally I use a hard surface like concrete or a brick when I do use the thing. I normally use the RCBS Collet Type whenever possible. Sorry I got the picture ass backwards.
Ron
I want to achieve the best possible accuracy I can for each of the half dozen rifles I shoot for mid-sized game animals. I don't want to pay someone else to develop loads I'm fully capable of developing on my own. The key difference id that I don't want to compromise on equipment to achieve the results I desire. At the end of the day, spending an extra 20-25% for purchasing foolproof equipment is criminal when you realize all of the time wasted attempting to correct compromised tools when a little bit of research would have enlightened you to the shortcomings you've exposed yourself to.
I guess what I'm trying to say is cry once, buy once, get the best and save yourself hours of frustration attempting to achieve results that are basic standards that no one should accept less than. I'm not going to achieve sub MOA at 3,200 feet per second with my 6.5-284 unless I get RL17 with 130grn Swift A Frames to work flawlessly together. It's much better than H4350, you just have to take the time to develop the loads. RL 17 is one of the most underrated powders available today, especially with high end and magnum loads.