I'm almost embarrassed to ask this question. I don't get it.
I have watched for years High End completive shooters demonstrate AND ADVISE that bolts should drop down into position on a case with only gravity pull.
I bought my first gun in the 60's and started hand loading (7mm Mag). Every time I closed the bolt (after FL sizing), it closed a little tight. Not alarming tight, just took a bit of effort. Mauser action in a Parker Hale. When I asked my mentor and store owners they said the reamer was just a bit different than the chamber in the +/- tolerances. I got between 12 and 15 loads out of cases. I got around 12-1500 rounds through the barrel.
My logic says, if a bolt can close on a round, dropping on it's own weight, then the case is a smidge shorter and skinnier than the chamber. That means there must be expansion to the chamber size on explosion. That means firing, re-sizing, firing, resizing, on and on, means flexing the brass every time.
My logic says, that a better/closer fit between case and chamber gets flexed less, therefor SHOULD last longer? I have yet to see any field testing for precision between there two case theories.
So help my logic. There must (assuming) something wrong with my thinking. What is it?
I have watched for years High End completive shooters demonstrate AND ADVISE that bolts should drop down into position on a case with only gravity pull.
I bought my first gun in the 60's and started hand loading (7mm Mag). Every time I closed the bolt (after FL sizing), it closed a little tight. Not alarming tight, just took a bit of effort. Mauser action in a Parker Hale. When I asked my mentor and store owners they said the reamer was just a bit different than the chamber in the +/- tolerances. I got between 12 and 15 loads out of cases. I got around 12-1500 rounds through the barrel.
My logic says, if a bolt can close on a round, dropping on it's own weight, then the case is a smidge shorter and skinnier than the chamber. That means there must be expansion to the chamber size on explosion. That means firing, re-sizing, firing, resizing, on and on, means flexing the brass every time.
My logic says, that a better/closer fit between case and chamber gets flexed less, therefor SHOULD last longer? I have yet to see any field testing for precision between there two case theories.
So help my logic. There must (assuming) something wrong with my thinking. What is it?










