dmoran
Donovan Moran
@jds holler
While I believe your planned approach of using maximum length cases has merit to aid against carbon of the chamber mouth, I still feel carbon is best controlled in our cleaning regiments. I base my input from barrel inspections of chambers that had both big gaps (+.030") and small gaps (-.005") from case mouth to chamber mouth. In both scenario's, feel it still boils down to cleaning and how the chamber mouth gets cleaned.
IME - as along as a person is aware of the probability of carbon issues, and address' it every time we clean, I see no issues with running a big gap, and do so myself (+.020" with my 6Dasher's).
				
			While I believe your planned approach of using maximum length cases has merit to aid against carbon of the chamber mouth, I still feel carbon is best controlled in our cleaning regiments. I base my input from barrel inspections of chambers that had both big gaps (+.030") and small gaps (-.005") from case mouth to chamber mouth. In both scenario's, feel it still boils down to cleaning and how the chamber mouth gets cleaned.
IME - as along as a person is aware of the probability of carbon issues, and address' it every time we clean, I see no issues with running a big gap, and do so myself (+.020" with my 6Dasher's).
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
								
							
							 
	








 
 
		 
 
		 jd
 jd 
 
		
 
 
		
