• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Athlon chronograph

riverman1

Silver $$ Contributor
Ordered mine from Blue Collar Reloading yesterday and it shipped today. The are selling for the original $349.99 price as well.

Looks like they have a few left.

 
I’ve had a few interference issues - random opportunity - with the Athlons, so it has limited my experimentation matrix, but so far, I haven’t seen much difference in performance between all of these options.

The LabRadar LX with its updated firmware is the fastest recycle time (unit at left was old firmware, slowest by far, right LX was new firmware and fastest). Updated LX’s are the fastest, then Athlons are faster recycle than Garmins. But Garmins are still as fast as we really ever shoot with aimed rifle fire.

More details forthcoming, but you can see here, units of each brand tend to be within 1fps of eachother, and all brands tend to be within the anticipated +/-0.1% (~3fps for this rimfire load), only rarely diverging by more.

IMG_2137.jpeg
 
On my first two outings with my Athlon, I had really far offset numbers, very sporadic results both high and low on the first outing compared to my LabRadar LX and my Garmin, with these two units agreeing within a 2-3fps offset, but the Athlon ranging from -13 below to +25-30 above these two. On the second day with the Athlon, I had another Garmin and another Athlon set up all side by side - 5 chronos running concurrently. The 2x Garmins were within 1.5fps (usually within 3/4), the LabRadar slightly faster again by a couple of fps, then BOTH Athlons were running higher than the other 3 by ~20fps rather consistently. Athlon responded that a factory reset should fix that offset. For what it is worth, I did not do the offset before this subsequent outing, hoping I would see the same offset and a correction after doing the reset, but the offset was gone during this trip.

IMG_2064.jpeg

I shot ~200 rounds across the units installed into that test fixture two days ago, and unfortunately had significant co-channel interference which caused me to remove my LabRadar V1 and a Caldwell Velociradar from the comparison, but I stored a continuous string of over 100 rounds for all 6 units (2x Athlons, 2x LabRadar LX’s, and 2x Garmins) - I’m compiling data now, but will admit, exporting the strings from all 6 units has been frustrating - I cannot get one of my Athlons to sync to my phone at all, it will connect and will confirm connection on both ends, even to the point of allowing the firmware update, but it will not sync the sessions, despite a few hours of reinstalling my app, reconnecting the devices, powering off and on, etc. I cannot get this particular Athlon to sync.

I DO have some fits that occasionally my Garmin will sync to the wrong phone, then it won’t send the sessions to the correct phone, but this isn’t so much of a problem, I simply export from whichever phone receives the data, BUT this Athlon won’t send the info anywhere.
 
So what do you think caused the Athlon units to be so far off, then
come back to within a couple of FPS with the other units?
Did you do the factory "reset" or just the positioning of the units?
 
I used my Athlon today at a match and I really liked it. I've used a Garmin on loan in the past and its fine too.
But I have to give the edge to Athlon as more simple to setup and on and off. Really very much the same basically. Other than the small performance issues noted by others. If I owned either one I would be happy.
 
So what do you think caused the Athlon units to be so far off, then
come back to within a couple of FPS with the other units?
Did you do the factory "reset" or just the positioning of the units?

I’m not certain what changed. I had restarted both units multiple times during the sessions in which I had demonstrated offsets and read errors, but nothing fixed it. That session included two Athlon units, mine and that of another shooter, both exhibited the same ~20fps high offset. I no longer have access to that shooter’s unit, but Athlon sent me a second unit for me to use during testing. When I restarted my unit this week, and initiated this new unit, the offset had resolved and it was reading in line with my other 4 chronographs present on the line (2x Garmins & 2x LabRadars).

I did install the firmware updates on both of my Athlons, and also updated the firmware on my LabRadar LX after the pictured multi-unit session above. The original firmware only displayed to the even integer speed, while the new firmware displays to the nearest 0.1fps.

I’m compiling data tonight to display 100 shot string comparison between these 6 units, and will share more regarding the relative readings soon. Should finish tonight or in the morning - with hundreds more shots to come.
 
I have a Garmin that has been perfect since the day I first turned it on. I’m watching the tests out of curiosity, but nothing I have seen thus far would even in the slightest, make me move from my Garmin. Garmin directs my boat on the water in total darkness and it directs many forms of aircraft to fly around this country. If it is trusted in those area’s, I feel confident in letting track the velocities my rifle bullets.
 
Went to Athlon site. Did not see any indication of such.

1.40.61.1 was issued last week, Thursday or Friday. The app is your resource for updates.

Following: most interested in velocaradar.
So far, the Velociradar has felt much like a repackaged LabRadar V1. I’ve had frustrating issues with aiming, despite aligning through the aiming peep integrated onto the body to the point that I have almost given up trying to concurrently test it with any other brands. At the $500 list price for the Velociradar, the LabRadar LX and Garmin Xero C1 are better performers, easier to set up and operate, and much smaller. At the $400 promotional/sale price on the Velociradar, the Athlon is again smaller and easier to use, and ALL of them have easier aiming. The LabRadar V1 is cheaper than the sale/promotional price of the Velociradar and remains to perform nearly the same. If Caldwell adjusts their pricing model to align with the current market, tagging the Velociradar at $350 regular price, then it would be a reasonable option. But the performance is lagging for the price.

IMG_2142.jpeg
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,257
Messages
2,192,282
Members
78,785
Latest member
Vyrinn
Back
Top