• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

AR barrel bedding

Just a thought. Thinking about various methods of bedding an AR barrel it occurred to me that a few warm up shots create enough heat expansion to secure the same effect as bedding or an interference fit. What do you guys think?
 
All of mine are bedded.

 
All of mine are bedded.

-1 or +1?
If never heard of -1 rifle has system.

Rifle speed has straight gas tubes
 
Just a thought. Thinking about various methods of bedding an AR barrel it occurred to me that a few warm up shots create enough heat expansion to secure the same effect as bedding or an interference fit. What do you guys think?
You would need to shoot a lot to get the chamber end hot enough to expand very much. Would you want the rifle to be inaccurate or have a drifting zero until it warms up? Blue Locktite always worked well for me. Lots of over thinking about this imo.
 
This has all been tried before. Some say do it and some say it doesn't matter. I have never seen a difference on target, except for when bedding the back of the upper receiver to the lower. That did make a bit of difference in reducing elevation dispersion. For the average shooter, it will not make any noticeable difference.
 
This has all been tried before. Some say do it and some say it doesn't matter. I have never seen a difference on target, except for when bedding the back of the upper receiver to the lower. That did make a bit of difference in reducing elevation dispersion. For the average shooter, it will not make any noticeable difference.
Not being a builder of rifles, I can only speak from experience from shooting. My Colt A2 in 5.56 shoots 1" average at 100 yards with hand loads. My Aero Precision M4E in 6 ARC shoots an average of 1/2" at 100 yards with 105 Hornady match. I've seen AR 15's in 6 ARC that cost more than twice as much as my Aero and shoot .4", .5" groups with 105 match ammunition.

For me an additional $1,500 will not serve me at all. If I can establish, even a lean to rest I can hit a deer in the head at 300 yards in just a few seconds. For a rifle and scope that was just under $2,000 do I need more?

With that said the rifle gets carried more than shot.
 
There are many long threads about this. The options are a tighter barrel extension, a tighter thermal fit upper, or some type of bedding compound.

I have used the BCM thermo-fit uppers. It is a TIGHT fit, think you better put the barrel in the freezer, and use a powerful heat gun on the upper, and some grease.

If you don't want to go through the trouble, use some Loctite 660 gap filling bedding compound.

Then there is the school of thought that with an appropriately torqued tight barrel nut, it doesn't matter. Truthfully I haven't objectively tested it either way.
 
Just a thought. Thinking about various methods of bedding an AR barrel it occurred to me that a few warm up shots create enough heat expansion to secure the same effect as bedding or an interference fit. What do you guys think?
I think you'll have the best results on an AR15 platform using the highest quality barrel you can afford paired with an upper receiver that separates the attachment of the barrel from the mounting of the handguard. I have a 6 Arc I built that had a noticble shift going from bipod/rear bag to shooting off just a bag on a barricade.

Some of the uppers that do this are the Aero enhanced upper and Seekins Precision. There are more options I can't recall at the moment.

If you're not worried about positionally induced impact shifts, just focus on the best barrel you can afford. Getting a quality bolt that is headspaced to your barrel is even better. I spent the money to get a Bartlein with fitted JPE bolt when Compass Lake was still making barrels for the consumer market and have zero regrets. I believe you can get Craddock to spin a Bartlein still. Thing is wonderfully precise. XCaliber and Criterion seem to also be good options for the AR.

1000015086.jpg
 
I think you'll have the best results on an AR15 platform using the highest quality barrel you can afford paired with an upper receiver that separates the attachment of the barrel from the mounting of the handguard. I have a 6 Arc I built that had a noticble shift going from bipod/rear bag to shooting off just a bag on a barricade.

Some of the uppers that do this are the Aero enhanced upper and Seekins Precision. There are more options I can't recall at the moment.

If you're not worried about positionally induced impact shifts, just focus on the best barrel you can afford. Getting a quality bolt that is headspaced to your barrel is even better. I spent the money to get a Bartlein with fitted JPE bolt when Compass Lake was still making barrels for the consumer market and have zero regrets. I believe you can get Craddock to spin a Bartlein still. Thing is wonderfully precise. XCaliber and Criterion seem to also be good options for the AR.

View attachment 1684981
I know that tripod!
1754918089800.jpeg
 
Just a thought. Thinking about various methods of bedding an AR barrel it occurred to me that a few warm up shots create enough heat expansion to secure the same effect as bedding or an interference fit. What do you guys think?
No! First it is not a consistent and controled process. There is no way to make it a consistent process.

This is not a complicated or expensive thing to do. Shimming the barrel is cheap and easy.

The process of using Loctite 609 is also well established and it is also used on damaged crank pulley knose or harmonic balancer knose in a pinch to repair a damaged surface for sealing with out machining to press on a crank saver or similar. I use shims but I have known people that have used the Locite method that is building on the part to change diemensions not at all like using Loctite Thread Lockers.

You used to be able to purchase sleeves as well but I do not think Borden makes them any more. I think it was Borden.

Before the Youtube National Socialist changed their rules which is seems to be hourly now there where even video's showing you how to do it. I sure they are still on the internet just not on youtube.

If you have the tools and have ever rebarreled an AR this is not something that should scar you. Just take your time and go slow.
 
The thermal conductivity of aluminum is about 10x that of stainless steel, and the thermal expansion coefficient of aluminum is about 4x that of stainless steel. The heat transfer coefficient of steel to aluminum is very high, only slightly lower than that of steel to water. So if the barrel extension were heated to the point of expanding in size, the contacting receiver mortise would expand MORE and actually become looser than the cool state. This is why creating the tight, consistent bedding fit between barrel extension and receiver is important.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,811
Messages
2,223,888
Members
79,867
Latest member
Steve1984
Back
Top