CharlieNC maybe you mean this - we have been foisted by our own petard. We had, back when, - a huge, thriving firearms industry in the US operating under private sector principles of profit motive and capital investment.
But stakeholders were free to sell, and they sure did. Generally they ran the price down first. Who thinks Lapua could be snatched away from Nammo by a group of investors? Cannot happen, Nammo isn’t a private company that can be bought. It could purchase Berger, and it did, but it, itself, is not for sale.
Ironically, the US government’s huge outlays for weapons to Ukraine gives the makers of these weapons enough cash to turn around and buy more US assets. There is no reason to think our other makers have not been approached.
There is a basic inequity here, other state’s governmental defense/joint enterprises will buy our companies, but the US gov does not compete with production, - that’s why there is no “USGAS” to rival Valero on even a single corner of an intersection where Circle K has two, but instead it will simply pledge tax and fiat money, and issues the requisitions which the fulfilling companies are then free to use the profits from, to buy more of our companies.
I’m not picking on Lapua, our greatest friend in the sport, but the system in place is that Nammo has the ability to sit in Scandinavia, sign an order for weapons made in Arizona, let Americans make them and pay for them, and reinvest the profits. This outcome of foreign ownership is less a plan than the byproduct of gushing, overwrought sympathy toward the plight of Ukrainians and one Volodymyr Zelensky, the most successful little begetter of aide I have ever seen.
How many guys here would gush THIS much sympathy and treasure and risk all out war, if Texas said Bye to the 49? Not just leaving, but flipping sides. No, the answer would be stand down Texas, don’t you have a conscience about where this leads? So, VZ, and Biden.