Curious if anyone has used both of these in the straight 6BR for the 95-107 gr bullets. It is my understanding both will work, just curious if one powder has a benefit over the other. Temp stability, easier to meter, burn rate/heat, etc.
AA2495 vs AA4064
- Thread starter VA_XTC_Shooter
- Start date
urbanrifleman
Site $$ Sponsor
They are the same powder, made my General Dynamics Canada (As is Lt32, AA2015, etc etc). Different burn rates. About a grain and a half apart.
AA 2495 = 4895
AA 4064 = Varget, R15
They make great powder. Very temp stable and clean.
AA 2495 = 4895
AA 4064 = Varget, R15
They make great powder. Very temp stable and clean.
not a wise statement to claim they are the same powder
urbanrifleman
Site $$ Sponsor
Whatever.
There are powder lines that are versions of the same formulation. Not a big secret or unknown to people who buy powder.
These two are on Hodgdon’s reloading data for the 6br Norma case. 4064 shows to give a bit more speed.
Yeah saw that, but was curious what other thoughts guys had on them. Doesn’t sound like they are used much.
Upgrades & Donations
This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.
Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.
You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.
To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.
Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.
You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.
To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.