PM the Forum Boss/Moderator.Any idea how long that takes?
PM the Forum Boss/Moderator.Any idea how long that takes?
Both are overkill for 500yd deer. For 800yd targets the 223 gets the job done, unless you're after high precision competition. Based strictly on the parameters you mentioned I'd ditch the mags altogether. 6.5 Lapua or everybodys fav Creedmore get your stated objectives done efficiently at much lower cost and recoil. New bolt and leftover action length of course.
I watched a hunter in Wyoming shoot an Elk with a 50BMG. Used a 750 Amax. The shot was from about 600 yards and in a valley. Shooter on top of a hillside. Upon the impact, it didn't really look as if the elk was hit as it jumped and walked a couple steps. A few more seconds and it staggered and dropped. The bullet entered and obviously exited without much damage other than thru lungs and possibly edge of heart. Point is besides the abuse from recoil or cost of ammo, his choice was his on weapon. Why have it if your not gonna use it as a hunter. I owned a 338 for years not drawing tags decided to use it on deer. Worked fine. I had better options but chose that rifle as it was one that was set up for hunting. Worked perfectly other than I still have the ringing in my ears from the brake on the barrel.No such thing as overkill. Wrong forum. I'd agree there may be better cartridges but killing deer with a 338 isn't overkill if that's your choice of weapon for the task. It's just "your" deer rifle.
Good choice either way. I look at the 7 mag and 300 mag as old school magnums. Muscle cars of the past but still fit in the now. Obviously they fit your niche. Good luck.I went ahead with the .300 WM after a lot of deliberation. Mainly it came down to availability of factory ammo and versatility of the round. Work is being done now! I can't wait to try it out!
Also, I posted my .300 RUM brass over in Classifieds if anyone is interested...