When I read that original link, it leads one to believe that using the bolt type that AA actually uses, has performance disadvantages and mentions the incorrect role that supposedly SAAMI played. Nevertheless, I got to writing 4 bullet points and decided this 65G forum thread from 2018 sums up the whole .125/.136 bolt depth back story much better. The 65G thread author LRRPF52 has been around the 65G since the beginning. Back when we both were on the original 65G forum back in 04/05. I’ve had at least one Grendel rifle since 05 and remember how things were pre SAAMI approval. Imagine thinking AA 65G brass at $31/100 was expensive.Well then perhaps you could enlighten us all by presenting facts.
Also that original link article statement that mentioned the .136 bolt being “under the copyright“ makes me cringe when folks incorrectly confuse copyright, trademark or patent terms. My main point to get across is that not all information found on the interwebs is the 100% true gospel.
BTW, historically when one doesn’t want to pay licensing fees, work arounds are created.……….
https://www.65grendel.com/forum/showthread.php?16123-SAAMI-barrels-bolts
Back on point……since it was mentioned that Hornady stated that it looked like fired ARC brass had excessive headspace, how many folks know which bolt depth their AR ARC chamber was cut for or was supposed to be headspaced to?