105g Berger hybrids or 105g Barts Gungnirs at .009” off hard jam, on top of 33.1gr of RL-15 in a 6 dasher with .132” freebore and a no turn .2715” neck, 1:8 or 1:7.5 to 8.0 gain twist cut rifled barrel. Personally, I only use Lapua brass and have DJ’s Brass hydro form them (although both Peterson and Alpha brass have worked well for others and don’t require hydro forming). The most accurate load I’ve even shot at 600 yards. Hands down.I have been shooting a 1-8 t for 400 rounds and have been all over the place using 105 VLDs and Varget. I'm wondering whats your favorite load using Varget - 105s or 108s for 300 - 400 yards.
Have a great 4th
Don
I have not tried VLD in the 6BR, but I heard that they are fussy to tune. I can’t find Berger Hybrids, so I’m using Lapua Scenar L, what I’m finding is pick a powder charge and stick with it. Low SD etc, then work with seating depth. My experience is within 6k is where you will find acceptable accuracy nodes, so I understand that it’s small, but run testing with no larger than 2k-3K difference between ladder steps. Otherwise you will miss your node and be testing large groups and wondering why nothing is working. I think the best method and money saver I have found for developing a load is finding the lands or Jam with multiple methods, and then seating them back 2-5k, to avoid sticking a bullet and loading up 50 rounds at a max length, bringing them All to the range and then using a KM Arbor press to find the seating depth. It will save many trips to the range. Saves time/money. It’s also the best bullet seating Press for concentric rounds.I have been shooting a 1-8 t for 400 rounds and have been all over the place using 105 VLDs and Varget. I'm wondering whats your favorite load using Varget - 105s or 108s for 300 - 400 yards.
Have a great 4th
Don
The 105gr Berger VLD aren’t that hard to tune, but certainly the 105gr Berger Hybrids are easier to tune. Both will shoot quite well from Jam to .020” off jam. The VLDs have also been known to shoot pretty good jumping them (which I’ve never found any success in doing). I totally agree with the seating depth info above.I have not tried VLD in the 6BR, but I heard that they are fussy to tune. I can’t find Berger Hybrids, so I’m using Lapua Scenar L, what I’m finding is pick a powder charge and stick with it. Low SD etc, then work with seating depth. My experience is within 6k is where you will find acceptable accuracy nodes, so I understand that it’s small, but run testing with no larger than 2k-3K difference between ladder steps. Otherwise you will miss your node and be testing large groups and wondering why nothing is working. I think the best method and money saver I have found for developing a load is finding the lands or Jam with multiple methods, and then seating them back 2-5k, to avoid sticking a bullet and loading up 50 rounds at a max length, bringing them All to the range and then using a KM Arbor press to find the seating depth. It will save many trips to the range. Saves time/money. It’s also the best bullet seating Press for concentric rounds.
Here's where I get confused. I thought "jam" was as far out into the lands as you could possibly seat a bullet for given neck tension?If that VLD isn’t working at jam, 10 in or 10 off it’s probably never going to work.
Question: I have only used CCI450 primers for the 6BR in a Lapua case. However, I see that most of you have posted loads using a CCI BR4 primer. Is there a distinct benefit to using the less powerful primer?
Really depends on your rifle. You could test the BR-4s with your load but you may not see any improvement in your groups. Sounds like it is doing well as is.
It is, the way I would define it. Like the length that a bullet would be if you forced the bolt closed and then ejected the round and measured it.Here's where I get confused. I thought "jam" was as far out into the lands as you could possibly seat a bullet for given neck tension?