I need a second opinion before getting too far.
I am working on a project of a full stock rifle with a 16†barrel for deer and hog size beasts at short range. I am a fan of 6.5 calibers and have a 260 Remington and a 6.5/284 if I need to reach out to long range.
Looking at the cartridges available, the Lapua is a smaller capacity case than the 260, Creedmoor or 284 and this should make it a better choice for the short barrel. The 6.5X47 is quite similar to the 7mm IHMSA (7mm International) and a lot of time was put into that cartridge to optimize it for a 15†pistol barrel.
I am not looking at the 6.5 Grendel due to the bolt face size, I have a couple of actions with a standard face I can use, and it does not handle 140 grain bullets well. And the extra 10,000+ psi of the Lapua vs. Grendel will make up some velocity.
I am looking for this to be a 200 yard and under gun, loss of velocity due to the short tube in not that much of a concern. It will still hit faster at 200 than the big ones at 500.
Is my thinking here sound?
Mark
I am working on a project of a full stock rifle with a 16†barrel for deer and hog size beasts at short range. I am a fan of 6.5 calibers and have a 260 Remington and a 6.5/284 if I need to reach out to long range.
Looking at the cartridges available, the Lapua is a smaller capacity case than the 260, Creedmoor or 284 and this should make it a better choice for the short barrel. The 6.5X47 is quite similar to the 7mm IHMSA (7mm International) and a lot of time was put into that cartridge to optimize it for a 15†pistol barrel.
I am not looking at the 6.5 Grendel due to the bolt face size, I have a couple of actions with a standard face I can use, and it does not handle 140 grain bullets well. And the extra 10,000+ psi of the Lapua vs. Grendel will make up some velocity.
I am looking for this to be a 200 yard and under gun, loss of velocity due to the short tube in not that much of a concern. It will still hit faster at 200 than the big ones at 500.
Is my thinking here sound?
Mark