I loaded some at .010,.016,.018,& .020 off and tested them today .016 shot really good..the 140 hybrids shot good at .018.I loaded some up using RL-16, best group at 100yrds was at 42gr., a tad higher than Berger suggested to me as well, about 3/8” out of my F class gun, didn’t find what I was looking for, going to try again with the H4350 see how that goes.
I’m running mine right at 2920-25fps with rl16 and a 30” Bartlein so it’s definitely nipping at the heels of a 180gr 7mm at 2850fps.Following. Keep testing guys! I wonder how it's going to compare to the 284 in the wind. Mike
They shoot great! I’ve only shot the 140 eldms to compare them to. I’m running RL16 with fed premium brass and fed match 210 primers.Have any of you fellas tried these out in their creed yet and how did they stack up against the 140 hybrids?
I’m using lapua SRP and rem 7 1/2s.They shoot great! I’ve only shot the 140 eldms to compare them to. I’m running RL16 with fed premium brass and fed match 210 primers.
RL17 and 41.5gns works great in mine. Node is wide, 41.2 up to 41.8 or so shoots to the same spot at 600yards.
IMR 4350, loaded low n slow at 40gns is really good too.
I have to jump a long ways to magazine feed, about 0.152", but they don't seem too finicky about it.
Both these loads are giving reliable 0.5MOA (3" or so) at 600, with groups dropping below 0.25MOA often (1.5" groups). So they shoot as well as I can with this particular rifle (RPR).
I know this will get some folks bent out of shape, but they shoot just like the 147 ELDM: same drop, same powder charges, just same across the board. But my results aren't with a BR or F setup and my requirements and expectations are lower.
This raises an obvious question in my mind: why buy the Berger 144s over the 147 ELD-Ms?
This raises an obvious question in my mind: why buy the Berger 144s over the 147 ELD-Ms?
Hopefully the 144s won't blow up. The new 144s also have a very slight BC Advantage at .336 G7 vs the 147 at .334. I really really liked the 147s up until they started going poof about 40 yards downrange on me.
Depends on your needs. I don't consider the ELDs BR ready, but they do a great job at plinking and PRS type shooting where small differences in bullet to bullet BC out at long range don't matter cause you only need to hit 1/2MOA. I'd hope the 144s, costing twice as much, would be much more consistent in a good BR gun and actually competitive in BR. In my rifle, they don't shoot any different. That's the rifle, not the bullet though.
This hasn't happened to me. I bought a whole case and the 1000 or so I've shot so far have all made it to the target. I'm only going a pedestrian 2750fps though out of a 7.7twist.
I have that luck with the 88 ELD. Although to be fair, my 22BR blows up the 90 VLD, and the 90 and 95 SMK. I think it's got a tight bore.I was shooting a State Championship with the 147's. During the second match of the day.. Poof.. Minus ten points.... Next shot "X" Next Shot Poof. Next shot Poof.. Minus 30 points... Ya a couple dollars saved... No thanks. All that money spent getting there and the bullet blows up. Completely not worth it. (Note: I have had good luck with other ELD's just not the Blow up prone 147)
Let's not let this thread drift of into a Hornady thread. So why not the Sierra 150 in 6.5 Creedmoor. I'd think it would buck the wind better than the Berger 144, if you could get enough velocity. Or is the 150 just to much for the Creed? 144 in an 8 twist or 150 in a 7.5 twist. Which would you want for 1K F-Class on a breezy day? Mike
It won't.Following. Keep testing guys! I wonder how it's going to compare to the 284 in the wind. Mike