dellet
Gold $$ Contributor
What I have not seen in this thread, and could have missed it is the most basic question of Where did the load data come from?
I do not load for this cartridge but out of curiosity have looked at some available data. The specific combination does not come up. The OP admits that he pieced it together.
The only loads I see, combined with the seated depth of that bullet, would seem to put that load at max charge or even slightly above. Note the Hodgdon data of a 140 Swift bullet. Max load of 40 grains and the OP’s load has the bullet seated about .050” deeper when you account for the difference in bullet length.
Normally not likely enough to cause the type of pressure seen here, but without good chamber measurements and case volume, the basics are being ignored.
Never mind the most basic rule of not starting at max load.
Others that use this combination may say otherwise, but that load is at or over max to begin with according to Hodgdon.
I do not load for this cartridge but out of curiosity have looked at some available data. The specific combination does not come up. The OP admits that he pieced it together.
The only loads I see, combined with the seated depth of that bullet, would seem to put that load at max charge or even slightly above. Note the Hodgdon data of a 140 Swift bullet. Max load of 40 grains and the OP’s load has the bullet seated about .050” deeper when you account for the difference in bullet length.
Normally not likely enough to cause the type of pressure seen here, but without good chamber measurements and case volume, the basics are being ignored.
Never mind the most basic rule of not starting at max load.
Others that use this combination may say otherwise, but that load is at or over max to begin with according to Hodgdon.